Advanced Search Results

Chandkhan Noonkhan Musalman and anr. Vs. Kishanlal Gangaram Parwal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480

Reported in : AIR1958MP242; 1958CriLJ1041

Advocate for Respondent : Manik Chand and ;Kak, Advs.

Abdul Hakim Khan, J. 1. The short facts leading to this revision are that the complainant Kishanlal, partner of the Jain Bidi Company, Guna, filed a complaint against Moti Khan and Chand Khan, proprietors of C....

Municipal Corporation and anr. Vs. Col. Anil Kak and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Madhya Pradesh Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 295(3); Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 24(3), 31 and 85

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT146; 2003(3)MPLJ379

Advocate for Respondent : Anoop Choudhary, Sr. Adv., i/b., Joon Choudhary and ;R.S. Laad, Advs., ;S. Bhargava, Sr. Adv., i/b., R. Bhargava, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;A.K. Sethi, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. Being aggrieved by order dated 21-3-2002 passed by XIIth ADJ, Indore in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 40/2001, arising out of the order passed on an injunction application filed by the plaintiff, by which...

Shyam Kak Vs. J.P. Gupta and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 35, 97, 98 and 100; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 24(1983)DLT12

M.L. Jain, J.(1) -ON 10-2.1977 the 21-A Janpath, New Delhi office of the Arya Offshore Service (P) Ltd., Bombay, wrote to Shri J.P. Gupte, one of the owners of premises S-56, Panchshila Park, New Delhi, enclosing...

Tulsiram Vs. Shyamlal Ganpatlal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 107 - Order 32, Rule 3(5); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5 and 101 to 104; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1960MP73

Advocate for Respondent : A.N. Kak, Adv.

Shiv Dayal Shrivastava, J.1. This second appeal arises out ofa decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Gwalior, reversing the decree passed by the Civil Judge, first class, Lashkar, whereby the plaintiff's suit for declaration of...

Moolchand Prop. Firm Lallimal Biharilal and ors. Vs. Ram Babu Vaishya

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1961MP323

Advocate for Respondent : Kak, Adv.

ORDERShiv Dayal, J.1. This revision is directed against an order of the trial Judge holding that the suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties and also holding that plaintiff No. 10 could not be joined...

Gulabchand Gappalal Sarawgi Vs. Manikchand Gulabchand Sarawgi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR1960MP263

Advocate for Respondent : A.N. Kak, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, J.1. This is a second appeal under Section 325 of the Zabta Diwani, Gwalior, relating to three disputes between two neighbours whose properties are adjacent to each others, separated by a common wall. The...

Tube Investments of India Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(71)ELT171TriDel

1. The appellant is aggrieved with the order passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Madras in order-in-original No. 29/91 dt. 6-9-1991.2. By this order, the ld. Collector has confirmed a demand of Rs. 1,19,05,834 (Rs....

Enforcement Directorate Vs. Nemi Chand JaIn @ Chandraswami

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1) and 56; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1976; Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 6(2), 10 and 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 5, 205, 273, 317, 392(2), 397(2), 397(3) and 482; Indian Penal Code; Constitution of Indian - Articles 21 and 227

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT277; 2008(101)DRJ255

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Lekhi, Sr. Adv. and ; K.K. Manan, ; Aman Vachher,

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The petitioners being the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in Crl. R.P. No. 772/2007 and Enforcement Directorate in Crl. R.P. Nos. 753/2007 to 761/2007(hereinafter referred to as the said petitioners) are aggrieved...

Ivrcl Ltd. Vs.rail Vikash Nigam Limited & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP(I) (COMM) 271/2017 Reserved on:13. H December, 2017 Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 IVRCL LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sumesh Dhawan, Ms.Vatsala Kak, Ms.Jasvin Dhama,...

Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Rep. by Its Commissioner Vs. Philom ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act - Sections 2(3), 388, 428, 428(1), 428(2), 429, 431, 433, 434, 435, 437, 440, 440(1), 450, 452, 454, 630, 631, 636(1) and 636(2); Karnataka Rent Control Act - Sections 50(1); Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 115 and 151 - Order 23, Rule 1, 1(3) and 1(4) - Order 39, Rules 1

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD1; 2008(1)ALT670

Advocate for Respondent : S. Satyanarayana Prasad, Sr. Counsel and; S.S. Prabhakar, Adv. for; Kum. C. Sindhu Kumari, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Rapid urbanisation has necessitated regulations being made, and restrictions being imposed, in public interest on the common law rights of individuals to construct buildings of their choice, Shiv Kumar Chadha v. Municipal Corporation...