Advanced Search Results

Mt. Bittan Bibi and anr. Vs. Kuntu Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35, 36 and 61; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 126 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101

Reported in : AIR1952All996

Advocate for Respondent : Shadi Lal Nigam and ;B. Dayal, Advs.

Raghubar Dayal J.1. The facts of the case are fully narrated in the judgment of my brother Desai J. I agree with him that the appeal of Smt. Bittan Bibi be dismissed as she is clearly...

Depot Manager, Apsrtc Vs. Poreddy Sujatha and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(30), 146, 146(1), 147, 156 and 157; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 94, 95, 97 and 103A

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD586

Advocate for Respondent : M. Rajamalla Reddy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and ;K.L.N. Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 6

C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Respondents 1 to 4, who are the widow, children and mother (hereinafter referred to as 'claimants') of Poreddi Janaki Reddy (hereinafter referred to as 'deceased'), filed O.P. No. 716 of 1990 before the...

Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P. Vs. RoopnaraIn Ramchandra (a Firm).

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1966]60ITR314(All)

M. C. DESAI C.J. - The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, has, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., submitted this statement of a case inviting this courts answers to the following questions :'1....

Balram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 17, 17(3), 18 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 332

Reported in : 1990CriLJ409

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

Palok Basu, J.1. This Full Bench has been constituted to resolve the conflict in the two decisions, one in writ petition No. 9475 of 1986 Kripa Shankar v. District Magistrate, Gorakhpur and others, and the other...

Sadhu Singh Vs. Haryana State Through the Secretary, State Transport a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : (2006)142PLR109

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Gulati, A.A.G.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff who was working as driver with the State Transport has approached this Court by filing instant appeal Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity 'the...

Zenith Steel Tubes and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sicom Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : SICA

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 15 and 31(1); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22 and 22(1); Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 9(2); Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 137; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 80 and 85; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : AIR2008SC451; 2008(2)ALLMR(SC)350; 2008(1)BomCR30; [2008]141CompCas428(SC); (2008)1SCC533; [2007]80SCL435(SC); 2007AIRSCW7240; AIR2008SC451; 2008(1)SCC533; 2008(1)LH(SC)731

Advocate for Respondent : Jay Salva and ; Meenkshi, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant no.1 company was carrying on business of manufacturing galvanised pipes. In November, 1992 the appellant-company approached the respondent for financial assistance amounting to Rs.1,42,000/- to meet a part of...

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Advocate General and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitutin of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC499; (2003)1UPLBEC378

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Mishra, S.C.

Y.R. Tripathi, J.1. These special appeals raising common questions of law and facts arise out of the judgment and order dated 20th August, 2001 passed by learned single Judge of this Court in Civil Misc. Writ...

Mohan Singh Bedi Vs. Phool Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16, 16(4), 21, 21(7), 34 and 34(4)

Reported in : AIR1982All465

Advocate for Respondent : Kailash Nath and ;P.K. Khare, Advs.

ORDERS.C. Mathur, J.1. This is landlord's petition arising from proceedings for release' and allotment of residential accommodation under Section 16 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act No. 13 of...

Prakash Chandra Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Municipalities (Contributory Provident Fund and Gratuity) Rules, 1963 - Rules 11 and 13; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Trust Employees Pension Service Rules, 1996 - Rule 256D

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ997Raj; RLW2003(3)Raj1643; 2002(4)WLC367; 2003(2)WLN281

Advocate for Respondent : Kailash Nath Joshi, Adv.

Balia, J.1. These three special appeals arise out of a common judgment and raise identical questions and hence, they are being disposed of by a Common Judgment.2. For the purpose of deciding these appeals, it would...

Rana Pratap Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceilings on Land Holdings Act, 1961; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 13, 14, 17, 17(3) and 18; Constitution of India - Article 21; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 6

Reported in : 1996CriLJ665

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

S.S. Sodhi, C.J.1. Binding judicial precedent the concept and ambit of it, as also the parameters of the per incuriam rule, are what arise for consideration in the context of the not infrequent instances of law...