Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k t pathak · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.131 seconds)

Sep 16 1949

Bhogilal Fulchand Vs. Chhanaji Bakerji Thakarda

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-16-1949

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Bombay Agricultural Debtors' Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1), 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Bom329; (1950)52BOMLR408

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Pathak, Adv.

Rajadhyaksha, J.1. This is an application in revision against an order passed by the Second Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ahmedabad, directing that Suit No. 2213 of 1947 pending before him should be transferred to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1970

Shardaben Vs. M.i. Pandya and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-1970

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110-C and 111-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 33; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1971Guj151; (1971)0GLR97

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Pathak, Adv.

1. The petitioner widow challenges in this petition the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, dismissing the petitioner's claim for compensation under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter referred to as 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1948

Jivram Jagjivandas Dave Vs. Kantilal Keshavlal Trivedi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-1948

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1950Bom247; (1950)52BOMLR104

Advocate for Respondent : C.K. Shah and ;K.T. Pathak, Advs. for Respondents 1 and 2

Bavdekar, J.1. This is an appeal from a suit which was filed by the plaintiff on behalf of himself and other creditors of defendant 6. The plaintiff said that, at the time when the salt was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Sep 12 1950

The Broach Borough Municipality Vs. Bhadriklal Ambalal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-1950

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 33, 33(2) and 58; Broach Municipal Rules, 1912 - Rules 182 and 189

Reported in : AIR1951Bom358; (1951)53BOMLR282; ILR1951Bom492

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Shah, ;V.T. Gambhirwalla and ;K.T. Pathak, Advs.

Bhagwati, J. 1. [His Lordship after stating facts as above proceeded :]2. The first question which was agitated before us was whether the resolution dated 16-12-1942, was validly passed, & if not, what was the effect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1954

Naranbhai Chhaganbhai Vs. Motibhai Ishwarbhai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-1954

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1859; Limitation Act, 1871; Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 2; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 28 - Schedule - Article 64; Baroda Limitation Act, 1887 - Schedule - Articles 47, 54 and 63; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Baroda Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1934; Baroda Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1936; Baroda Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1939; Interpretation Act - Sections 39; Baroda General Clauses Act - Sections 11; Baroda, Samanya Kalvano Nibandh of Corresponding Act, 1951 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1955Bom406; (1955)57BOMLR509

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Pathak, Adv.

1. The present appeal arises from a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs. 7,000 due upon a 'khata' dated I5-12-1934, for Rs. 9,000 signed by two persons Motibhai Ishwar-bhai and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1963

Yusufbhai Ismailbhai and anr. Vs. Vakil Mohanlal and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-18-1963

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 38 and 47; Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1947 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1965Guj282

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Shah, Adv. for; K.T. Pathak and; N.S.Parghi, Ad

(1) It is contended in this appeal that although the High Court passed a decree in a suit on mortgage for the recovery of the principal amount of Rs. 60,000/- together within interest and further ordered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1961

State Vs. Dhiria Bhavji

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-24-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Children Act, 1948 - Sections 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Indian Penal Code , 1860 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1963Guj78; 1963CriLJ431; (1962)GLR503

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Pathak, Adv.

Raju, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the acquittal of the respondent, who was tried by the Juvenile Court at Baria, for an offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code for having caused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1966

Keshavlal Lallubhai Narnadas and ors. Vs. Patel Bhailal Narandas and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-31-1966

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 7, 32 and 39

Reported in : AIR1968Guj157; (1968)0GLR649

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Shah,; S.M. Shah,; K.T. Pathak and;

Bhagwati, J. 1. The short question that arises for determination is this appeal is as to the date of dissolution of a partnership constituted of the plaintiffs and the defendants. By a deed of partnership dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1963

Kantilal Chandulal Patwa Vs. Chhotelal Shankarlal Trevedi and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-09-1963

Subject : FamilyCommercial

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1964Guj29; (1964)0GLR288

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Pathak, Adv.

ORDERV.B. Raju, J. 1. A pro-note was executed by one Ramanlal on behalf of the firm of Chandulal Chhaganlal. In a suit based on a pro-note filed against the two defendants, namely Ramantal Chandulal and Kantilal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
Next ›

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.