Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k s shukla · Page 1 of about 22 results (0.130 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 16 2002

Sayed Haidar Ali Naqvi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-16-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 14; Bombay Port Trust Employees Regulations, 1976 - Regulation 12(8); Indian Police Service (Probation) Rules, 1954 - Rule 12; Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311 (2)

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1611; (2002)3UPLBEC2181

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Shukla, S.C.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. Petitioner Syed Haider All Naqvi has challenged order dated 3.7.1989 passed by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari. Allahabad, terminating his services and order dated 2.2.1991 passed by the Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1998

Manoj Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. the District Basic Education Officer an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-16-1998

Subject : CivilService

Reported in : (1999)1UPLBEC776

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Shukla, Adv. and ;S.C.

D.K. Seth, J.1. In this petition, the petitioners had claimed consideration of their candidature for selection of teachers for basic schools which required the prescribed qualification of B.T.C. where as the petitioners were B. Ed.2. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1997

Rajeev Ratanam Tewari and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-14-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Services Rules, 1981 - Rules 14, 14(2), 16, 17 and 17A; Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 1994 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 8

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC162; (1997)3UPLBEC2105

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;K.S. Shukla, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 21.6.1997 passed by the Chairman, Board of Basic Education, U. P., Allahabad/Director of Education (Basic), U. P., Allahabad, respondent No. 3 cancelling the appointments...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 06 1999

Khagendra Nath Rai and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-06-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC73; (2000)1UPLBEC716

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;K.S. Shukla, Adv.

A.K. Yog, J.1. All the petitioners are working as Assistant Teacher inrecognised Primary Schools/Junior High Schools in their respective institutions but denied benefit of B.T.C. qualification under impugned orders dated 16th December. 1996 (Annexure-17 to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2002

Parmeshwari Dayal Saxena Vs. Basic Shiksha Parishad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC817; [2002(93)FLR492]; (2002)2UPLBEC1398

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Shukla, ;Shatrughan Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri S.N. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri K.S. Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. Petitioner is challenging the order dated 20.4.1993 passed by the Director/President, Basic Shiksha...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad Through Its Secretary and Basic Shiksha Ad ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 1, 1(5), 2, 15, 16, 15(2), 17, 17(2) and 27; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 22F and 27; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 85(1); Industrial Dispute Act

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2992; [2006(109)FLR1101]; (2006)IIILLJ417All

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Nigam, Adv. and ;S.C.

Sabhajeet Yadav, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.3.1993 (Annexure -1 of the writ petition) passed by Prescribed Authority under the provisions of Payment of Wages Act 1936 in P.W. Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1978

Suresh Ramanlal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-27-1978

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (1979)1GLR391

M.K. Shah, J.1. An interesting question with regard to the interpretation of Section 50 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, (hereinafter referred to 'the Act') arises in this criminal revision application which is preferred by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1999

Suresh Chandra Jatav Vs. Chairman, District Board, Etawah and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-15-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC260; (1999)3UPLBEC2176

Advocate for Respondent : V.J. Sahai and ;Pradeep Kumar, Advs.

V. M. Sahai, J. 1. The petitioner was appointed in 1983 as Assistant Teacher in Primary Pathshala. Baliyapur Development Block. Jaswant Nagar. He was an employeeof District Board. Etawah. He worked till 31.12.89 and went on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1997

Kailash Raj Vs. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973 - Rule 4 and 4 (1)

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC685

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Shukla, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner was suspended by an order dated 25.11.1993, Annexure-3 to the writ petition, on the ground that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner in connection with a case pending before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2002

Shiv Kumar Awasthi and ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-01-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6E

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC399; (2003)1UPLBEC87

Advocate for Respondent : K.L. Grover, ;A.K. Pandey and ;K.S. Shukla, Advs. and ;S.C.

Rakesh Tiwari, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought the relief of mandamus directing respondent No. 1, Punjab National Bank,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial