Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k s ravishankar and · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 02 2007

Commissioner of Customs Vs. I2 Technologies Software Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(44), 15, 15(1), 23, 23(2), 46, 47, 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2), 111, 112, 114, 117 and 130(1); Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2008(128)ECC245; 2008(154)LC245(Karnataka); 2007(217)ELT176(Kar); 2008(3)AIRKarR166(DB)

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Ravishankar, Adv.

Arali Nagaraj, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') questioning the correctness of the order dated 23.8.2005 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2000

Process Pumps India P. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jun-23-2000

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(93)LC256Tri(Bang.)alore

1. As the issue lies in a short compass, the stay application is allowed by way of granting waiver and stay of the recovery and the appeal itself is taken up for disposal as per law....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2010

The Chief Commissioner Large Tax Payers Unit Vs. Tnt India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-2010

Subject : Direct TaxationOther Taxes

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65(121), 65(125), 70, 70(2), 73, 74, 83, 83A, 84, 84(2) or 85, 86, 86(1) and 86(1)(1A)(2); ; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 37B; ; Right to Information Act (RTI); ; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Ravi Shankar, Adv.

B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. The revenue has preferred this appeal by challenging the order dated 28.11.2006 passed in Final Order No. 1947/2006 by CESTAT at Bangalore.2. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2018

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S Bell Ceramics Ltd

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-25-2018

Subject : Service Tax

1/19 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF JULY2018PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA C.E.A.No.65/2016 BETWEEN: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, BENGALURU-I...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1996

Crescent Tool Engineering Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Mar-10-1996

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1996)(86)ELT90Tri(Chennai)

1. These appeals arise out of common impugned order of Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore and are therefore, taken up together for disposal. Under the impugned order duty of Rs. 1,74,242.23 has been demanded from appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2008

indo NissIn Foods Limited Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-30-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 90(2), 90(1), 154, 195, 201(1A), 201(1) and 260A

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Kar)572; [2008]301ITR143(KAR); [2008]301ITR143(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Seshachala, Adv.

Deepak Verma, J.1. Heard Sri K.S. Ravishankar, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Sri M.V. Seshachala, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 2 shall be referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2011

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. M/S. Stanzen Toyotetsu I ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-08-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)55; 2012(1)KCCR468(DB)

(Prayer: This CEA filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of Order dated 01/05/2009 passed in Final Order No.573/2009, praying to decide the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1999

Hitachi Koki India Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-23-1999

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2000)(90)LC544Tri(Chennai)

1. This is an appeal against order-in-ap-peal No. C. Cus. 1315/98, dt.6.1.1999 wherein the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the loading of assessable value by 10.58% in case of goods imported by the appellants prescribed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2001

M/S Inys Medical Research Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Oct-05-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(78)ECC649

1. This appeal arises out of and is directed against the Order-in-Original dated 7.8.2000 passed by the Commissioner of Customs Bangalore.2. Issue relates to denial of benefit of exemption in terms of Notification No 64/88 Cus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2002

Mahavir Ispat Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-09-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(106)LC19Tri(Hyd.)erabad

1. These are two appeals filed by the appellants. After hearing for some time with reference to the stay petitions, we felt that the matter itself can be disposed of. Accordingly the appeals were taken up...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial