Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Customs Vs. I2 Technologies Software Pvt. Ltd.
Karnataka
Aug-02-2007
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(44), 15, 15(1), 23, 23(2), 46, 47, 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2), 111, 112, 114, 117 and 130(1); Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1)
2008(128)ECC245; 2008(154)LC245(Karnataka); 2007(217)ELT176(Kar); 2008(3)AIRKarR166(DB)
K.S. Ravishankar, Adv.
Arali Nagaraj, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') questioning the correctness of the order dated 23.8.2005 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProcess Pumps India P. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jun-23-2000
Service Tax
(2000)(93)LC256Tri(Bang.)alore
1. As the issue lies in a short compass, the stay application is allowed by way of granting waiver and stay of the recovery and the appeal itself is taken up for disposal as per law....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chief Commissioner Large Tax Payers Unit Vs. Tnt India Pvt. Ltd.
Karnataka
Apr-16-2010
Direct TaxationOther Taxes
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65(121), 65(125), 70, 70(2), 73, 74, 83, 83A, 84, 84(2) or 85, 86, 86(1) and 86(1)(1A)(2); ; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 37B; ; Right to Information Act (RTI); ; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963
K.S. Ravi Shankar, Adv.
B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. The revenue has preferred this appeal by challenging the order dated 28.11.2006 passed in Final Order No. 1947/2006 by CESTAT at Bangalore.2. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S Bell Ceramics Ltd
Karnataka
Jul-25-2018
Service Tax
1/19 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF JULY2018PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA C.E.A.No.65/2016 BETWEEN: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, BENGALURU-I...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrescent Tool Engineering Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Mar-10-1996
MRTP
(1996)(86)ELT90Tri(Chennai)
1. These appeals arise out of common impugned order of Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore and are therefore, taken up together for disposal. Under the impugned order duty of Rs. 1,74,242.23 has been demanded from appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindo NissIn Foods Limited Vs. Income-tax Officer
Karnataka
Jan-30-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 90(2), 90(1), 154, 195, 201(1A), 201(1) and 260A
(2008)217CTR(Kar)572; [2008]301ITR143(KAR); [2008]301ITR143(Karn)
M.V. Seshachala, Adv.
Deepak Verma, J.1. Heard Sri K.S. Ravishankar, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Sri M.V. Seshachala, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 2 shall be referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. M/S. Stanzen Toyotetsu I ...
Karnataka
Apr-08-2011
Service Tax
2012ILR(Kar)55; 2012(1)KCCR468(DB)
(Prayer: This CEA filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of Order dated 01/05/2009 passed in Final Order No.573/2009, praying to decide the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHitachi Koki India Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-23-1999
MRTP
(2000)(90)LC544Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal against order-in-ap-peal No. C. Cus. 1315/98, dt.6.1.1999 wherein the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the loading of assessable value by 10.58% in case of goods imported by the appellants prescribed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Inys Medical Research Vs. Commissioner of Customs,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Oct-05-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(78)ECC649
1. This appeal arises out of and is directed against the Order-in-Original dated 7.8.2000 passed by the Commissioner of Customs Bangalore.2. Issue relates to denial of benefit of exemption in terms of Notification No 64/88 Cus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahavir Ispat Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad
Oct-09-2002
Excise
(2003)(106)LC19Tri(Hyd.)erabad
1. These are two appeals filed by the appellants. After hearing for some time with reference to the stay petitions, we felt that the matter itself can be disposed of. Accordingly the appeals were taken up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »