Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Customs Vs. I2 Technologies Software Pvt. Ltd.
Karnataka
Aug-02-2007
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(44), 15, 15(1), 23, 23(2), 46, 47, 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2), 111, 112, 114, 117 and 130(1); Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1)
2008(128)ECC245; 2008(154)LC245(Karnataka); 2007(217)ELT176(Kar); 2008(3)AIRKarR166(DB)
K.S. Ravishankar, Adv.
Arali Nagaraj, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') questioning the correctness of the order dated 23.8.2005 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProcess Pumps India P. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jun-23-2000
Service Tax
(2000)(93)LC256Tri(Bang.)alore
1. As the issue lies in a short compass, the stay application is allowed by way of granting waiver and stay of the recovery and the appeal itself is taken up for disposal as per law....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chief Commissioner Large Tax Payers Unit Vs. Tnt India Pvt. Ltd.
Karnataka
Apr-16-2010
Direct TaxationOther Taxes
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65(121), 65(125), 70, 70(2), 73, 74, 83, 83A, 84, 84(2) or 85, 86, 86(1) and 86(1)(1A)(2); ; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 37B; ; Right to Information Act (RTI); ; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963
K.S. Ravi Shankar, Adv.
B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. The revenue has preferred this appeal by challenging the order dated 28.11.2006 passed in Final Order No. 1947/2006 by CESTAT at Bangalore.2. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Crescent Tool Engineering Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Mar-10-1996
MRTP
(1996)(86)ELT90Tri(Chennai)
1. These appeals arise out of common impugned order of Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore and are therefore, taken up together for disposal. Under the impugned order duty of Rs. 1,74,242.23 has been demanded from appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindo NissIn Foods Limited Vs. Income-tax Officer
Karnataka
Jan-30-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 90(2), 90(1), 154, 195, 201(1A), 201(1) and 260A
(2008)217CTR(Kar)572; [2008]301ITR143(KAR); [2008]301ITR143(Karn)
M.V. Seshachala, Adv.
Deepak Verma, J.1. Heard Sri K.S. Ravishankar, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Sri M.V. Seshachala, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 2 shall be referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S Bell Ceramics Ltd
Karnataka
Jul-25-2018
Service Tax
1/19 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF JULY2018PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA C.E.A.No.65/2016 BETWEEN: THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, BENGALURU-I...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHitachi Koki India Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-23-1999
MRTP
(2000)(90)LC544Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal against order-in-ap-peal No. C. Cus. 1315/98, dt.6.1.1999 wherein the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the loading of assessable value by 10.58% in case of goods imported by the appellants prescribed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPress Fab Precision Components Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Aug-02-2005
Service Tax
1. These appeals have been filed against Order-in-Appeal No. 637/02, dated 22-10-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals) Bangalore.3. M/s. Press Fab Precision Components Pvt. Ltd., was incorporated on 1-4-1999. Prior to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPsi Data Systems Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-15-2006
Service Tax
1. This is an appeal against OIA No. 441/03 Cus dated 22^nd December 2003 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). The appellant is a 100% EOU, They imported certain goods for development of computer software...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. M/S. Stanzen Toyotetsu I ...
Karnataka
Apr-08-2011
Service Tax
2012ILR(Kar)55; 2012(1)KCCR468(DB)
(Prayer: This CEA filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of Order dated 01/05/2009 passed in Final Order No.573/2009, praying to decide the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »