Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k s natarajan · Page 1 of about 28 results (0.152 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 2004

V. Krishnamurthy, Proprietor, Meena Advertisers Vs. Airports Authority ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(1)CTLJ606(Mad); (2004)2MLJ314

Advocate for Respondent : Vijayanarayanan, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ; K.S. Natarajan, Adv. for the Respondent No. 3

A. Kulasekaran, J.1. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the Notice Inviting Tender for licensing indoor and outdoor advertisement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2003

S. Pancharatnam Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-10-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ9

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Natarajan, Adv. for for Respondent-1 and ;K.M. Sugadev, Adv. for Respondent-2

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J. 1. Challenging the appointment of the second respondent as member of the State Advisory Committee of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Regulatory Advising Commission, as notified in the notification dated 16.10.2002, for a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2002

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Environm ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-08-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : I(2003)BC216

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Natarajan, Adv.

F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. We heard the learned counsel for the Appellant as well as the Respondent.The short question that arises for consideration in this Writ Appeal is as to the interpretation of Clause 30 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 14 2002

Voice Consumer Care Council Rep. by Its Founder Trustee, Chennai Vs. S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-14-2002

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Tariff of Supply of Electricity Energy Act, 1978; Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960; Bihar Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1981; Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966; Sugar (Control) Order, 1966; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Constitutional Amendment Act; E.R.C. Act, 1998 - Sections 21(1); Constitution (42nd) Amendment Act, 1976 - Article 323A

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ799

Advocate for Respondent : R. Muthukumaraswamy, Addl. Adv. General assisted by Mrs. T. Kokilavani, Govt. Adv., ;Vasudevan and ;K.S. Natarajan, Advs.

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, C.J.1. At issue, is the constitutionality of revision of power tariff by the State of Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board prepares Budget estimates every year and they are placed before the State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2014

M/S Nova Ads Vs. Metropolitan Tansp.Corp. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.223 OF2009M/s. Nova Ads ... Petitioner Versus Metropolitan Transport Corporation And Ors. ... Respondents WITH C.A. No.11037 OF2014(@ SLP(C) No.276/2007) C.A. No.11038 OF2014(@...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1986

The Central Bank of India, Rep. by Asst. General Manager, Regd. Office ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-22-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1987)1MLJ349

ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The petitioner, the Central Bank of India, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner bank, has come to this Court, stating, as follows : The fourth respondent requested for financial assistance for their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2000

N. Baby Nair and anr. Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-2000

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ41

ORDERS. Jagadeesan, J.1. In both these writ petitions, the prayer is identical, seeking for the issue of a mandamus, forebearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioners' business of running the bunk situated near the Kilpauk...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2005

Gupta Enterprises Rep. by Its Partner Mr. Krishna Kishore Vs. the Prin ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 5 and 5(3)

Reported in : [2006]145STC453(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Selvi George, Adv. for ;V.S. Sethuraman, Special Govt. Pleader

ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The petitioner, claiming to be the largest exporter of sandal wood, prays for a mandamus to forbear the respondents from making any claim or demand for the payment of demurrage charges and penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2002

Deivasigamani and S. Mahalingam Vs. the State Rep. by the Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-11-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 420, 406; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C.) - Sections 70, 70(2) and 309; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1788

Advocate for Respondent : A.N. Thambidurai, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. Criminal Revision Petition is filed against the orders dated 23.08.2002 made in C.M.P. No. 2509 of 2002 in C.C. No. 218 of 1993 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.15.2. It is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2012

A.K. Balaji Vs. Australia

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-21-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 17, 47, 29, 24, 42(2),49(1)(e)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.M.Ravindran, Adv.

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 8 to take appropriate action against the respondents 9 40 or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial