Advanced Search Results
Premier Motors (P.) Ltd. Vs. Ashok Tandon and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-18-1970
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 391(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 79; Evidence Act - Sections 114
[1971]41CompCas656(All)
R.K. Gulati, ;J.N. Tewari, ;G.P. Tandon, ;K.S. Hajela, ;Suresh Pd., ;Ambika Pd., ;T.N. Sapru, ;Bharatji Agarwal, ;V.C. Misra and ;G. Malviya, Advs.
M.H. Beg, J.1. There are two connected applications before me made under Rule 79 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, read with Section 391(2) of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act '),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyan Chand Vs. Minister, Local Self-govt.
Rajasthan
May-15-1953
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 166(2); Jaipur District Boards Act - Sections 4A, 4A(3), 51 and 52; Jaipur District Boards (Amendment) Act, 1950;
AIR1954Raj166
K.S. Hajela, Adv. General
Ranawat, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by one Kalyan Chand against the Minister, Local Self-Government; Secretary to the Government, Local Self-Government Department; Director of Local Bodies, Rajasthan,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCustodian Evacuee Property Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Mohd. Saeed
Rajasthan
May-10-1957
PropertyCivil
Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - 22; Administration of Evacuee Property (Amendment) Act, 1953; ;Administration of Evacuee Property (Central) Rules - Rule 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1958Raj93
K.S. Hajela, A. Ahmed and; I. Ahmed, Advs.
Bapna, J. 1. This is a reference under Section 27(2) of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act (Act No. XXXI of 1950), 1950 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) by the Deputy Custodian General...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajvi Amar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sep-05-1955
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 166, 233, 234, 236, 309, 320 and 363
AIR1956Raj104
K.S. Hajela, Adv. General and; R.A. Gupta, Deputy Govt. Adv.
Bapna, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The petitioner was a District and Sessions Judge in the former Bikaner State for some years prior to the formation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRawat Man Singh Vs. Roop Chand Sogani and ors.
Rajasthan
Oct-20-1953
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 82, 86, 86(3), 86(4), 86(5), 89, 90, 92, 98, 109, 110; Rajasthan High Court Judges Salaries Order, 1951;
AIR1954Raj158
K.S. Hajela, Adv. General and; G.C. Kasliwal, Adv.
Bapana, J. 1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India,2. The petitioner Bawat Man Singh is a returned candidate to the Rajasthan Legislative-Assembly from Jamua Ram Garh constituency in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurajmal Baj Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-03-1953
Other TaxesConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 301, 304, 305 and 366(10); Jaipur Municipal Act, 1943 - Sections 62, 63, 63(2) and 77
AIR1954Raj260
K.S. Hajela, Adv. General (for No. 1) and; H.C. Dhandia, Adv. (for Nos. 2 to 4)
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution by Surajmal Baj for issue of a writ of mandamus, prohibition or any other appropriate writ, or direction or order against the State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Sahiban Shersingh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Nov-10-1953
TenancyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(5) and 212A(2); Tenancy Law; Rajasthan Produce Rents Regulating Act, 1951 - Sections 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Rajasthan Produce Rents Regulating (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 1; Constitutional Law
AIR1954Raj65
K.S. Hajela and; Kansingh, Advs.
Dave J. 1. These are two connected applications for issue of a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the applicants pray that the Rajasthan Produce Rents Regulating Act (No. 15) of 1951...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhosingh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-13-1954
Constitution
Rajasthan Agricultural Rents Control Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3); Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1954Raj197
K.S. Hajela, Adv. General
Wanchoo, C.J.1. These are connected applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of the Rajasthan Agricultural Rents Control Act (No. XIX) of 1952.2. The Act was passed on 14-5-1952, and was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadaria and anr. Vs. the Rajasthan Board of Revenue and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-02-1954
PropertyConstitution
Tenancy Law; Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 1(3) and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 10(3), 212A, 245 and 385; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitution (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145
AIR1954Raj224
K.S. Hajela, Adv.-General and; D.M. Bhandari, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
Bapna J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The facts of the case are that on 11-8-1952,Bhomla, respondent No. 2, made an application under Sections 7 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMilap Chand Vs. Dwarka Das
Rajasthan
Apr-22-1954
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 245 and 254(1); Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 6, 8, 28 and 31; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
AIR1954Raj252
K.S. Hajela, Adv. General
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. Milap Chand is a defendant in a suit filed by Dwarka Das, opposite party, in the Court of Munsif East, Jaipur City. Dwarka Das had taken a house on rent from the applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›