Advanced Search Results
State Vs. Pundlik Bhikaji Ahire and anr.
Mumbai
Dec-04-1958
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1) and 4(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 423
AIR1959Bom543; (1959)61BOMLR837; 1959CriLJ1421
K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Shah, J.1. Pundlik Bhikaji Ahire, whom we will hereafter refer to as the first accused and Fajitrao Damu Mahale, whom we will hereafter refer to as the second accused, were tried by the Special Judge, Ahmednagar,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnaji Babacharya Mahuli Vs. the State
Mumbai
Jul-18-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 210, 213 and 215; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 409, 467 and 477-A
AIR1953Bom33; (1952)54BOMLR808; ILR1953Bom76
K.S. Daundkar, Asst. Govt. Pleader
ORDER[1] The Additional Magistrate, First Class, Belgaum, committed four accused to stand their trial at the Court of Session under Sections 409, 467 and 477A, Penal Code read with Section 34, Penal Code, Accused 1 has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankarappa Ramappa and ors. Vs. State of Bombay and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-02-1955
Constitution
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1933 - Sections 11, 29, 99, 99(1), 102, 102(1), 102(3), 102(4), 107, 107(2) and 109
AIR1957Bom55; (1956)58BOMLR278; ILR1956Bom397
K.S. Daundkar, ;H.D. Gole, ;M.A. Rane, ;R.S. Daundkar, ;S.B. Bhasme, Advs. and ;V.S. Desai, Adv. for ;Govt. Pleader
Chagla, C.J. 1. This petition is the result of an extremely unfortunate controversy between Kannad speaking and Marathi speaking members of the Village Panchayat of Sankeshwar which is situated in Hukeri Taluka in the Belgaum District....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State Vs. Mansi Karamsi
Mumbai
Mar-10-1953
Criminal
Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 61 and 61(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1954Bom55; (1953)55BOMLR717; ILR1953Bom1278
K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Chainani, J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Bombay. The opponent owns a grocery shop within Thana municipal limits. In this shop he used to store and keep for sale ghee made from milk....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankarrao Madhavrao Vs. K.C. Sen and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-21-1955
Tenancy
Tenancy Laws; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 6, 8, 8(2), 12, 12(5), 74(1) and 76; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1956Bom79; (1955)57BOMLR1023
K.S. Daundkar, ;D.M. Parulekar and ;H.D. Gole, Advs.
Bavdekar, J.1. Tills is an application for a writ of certiorari or an order or a direction quashing the order of the Bombay Revenue Tribunal which refused to entertain an application for revision of an order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment of the Province of Bombay Vs. Laxman Govind Deshmukh
Mumbai
Nov-17-1949
Criminal
Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2(1) and 2(6)
AIR1950Bom257; (1950)52BOMLR226
K.S. Daundkar, Adv.
Bavdekar J.1. This is an appeal by the Government of Bombay against the acquittal of the opponent of an alleged contravention of an order made by the District Magistrate of Ahmednagar under the provisions of Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhimaji Narasu Mane Vs. Vijayasinvrao Ramrao Dale
Mumbai
Jul-26-1954
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(2), 14, 291, 291(1), 362 and 366; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 85, 86, 87-B and 113
AIR1955Bom195; (1955)57BOMLR60; ILR1955Bom62
K.S. Daundkar, Adv.;G.N. Joshi and ;D.P. Sethna, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.1. The plaintiff filed a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jath, against the Raja-saheb of Jath, claiming certain reliefs. A preliminary objection was taken to the maintainability of the suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithal Maruti Vs. State
Mumbai
Feb-27-1952
CriminalConstitution
Bombay Beggars Act, 1945 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(4), 5(5), 6, 6(1), 6(3), 20, 23 and 23(1); Constitution of India - Article 15
AIR1952Bom451; (1952)54BOMLR626; ILR1953Bom51
K.S. Daundkar, Assistant Govt. Pleader
Vyas, J.[1] This is an appeal by one Vithal son of Maruti who has been convicted by the learned Presidency Magistrate, nth Court, Kurla, Bombay under Section 5, Sub-section (5), read with Section 6, Sub-section (3),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDattatraya Motiram More Vs. State of Bombay
Mumbai
Nov-18-1952
ConstitutionElection
Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 10(1); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 15, 16, 16(1)(2), 16(3), 19, 58(2), 59(2), 64, 66(4), 102(1), 191(1) and 158(2); Civil Proceudre Code, 1908
AIR1953Bom311; (1953)55BOMLR323; ILR1953Bom842
M.P. Amin, Adv. General, Little & Co., ;G.S. Gypte, ;K.B. Sukthankar, ;K.S. Daundkar and ;D.V. Patel, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.(1) This is a petition by a resident of Jalgaon who is a tax payer of the Jalgaon Municipality and a voter in one of the wards, challenging certain provisions of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPranjivandas Sunderji Vs. State of Bombay
Mumbai
Jun-20-1952
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 486
AIR1953Bom85; (1952)54BOMLR795
K.S. Daundkar, Asst. Govt. Pleader;E.B. Ghaswala, ;Craigie, ;Blunt and ;Caroe, Advs.
Bavdekar, J.(1) The appellant has been convicted by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, of an offence under Section 486 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »