Advanced Search Results

S. Mohan Gandhi Vs. Sri Visalam Chit Funds and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)149CTR(Mad)106

R. Balasubramanian, J.These two revisions have been filed by the Income Tax Department questioning the order dated 11-4-1983, in C.M.P. No. 174 of 1983 in C.C. No. 22 of 1983 and against the order dated 4-9-1984,...

income-tax Officer Vs. D. Manoharlal Kothari

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct TaxationCompany

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 192, 194A, 194A(1), 276B and 278D

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas275(Mad); (1999)155CTR(Mad)619; [1999]236ITR357(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Ramasamy, Adv. in Crl. R.C. No. 849 of 1996 and;K.A. Panchapagesan, Adv. in Crl. R.C. No. 316 of 1989

Rengasamy, J. 1. These revisions arise against the orders of the Principal Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, and also the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Madras.2. The Income-tax Officer, who is the revision petitioner in...

Hema Mohnot Vs. State Through Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Adminis ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132(4) and 277; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227, 228, 245, 245(1), 313, 313(1) and 317; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 173, 177, 181, 182, 193, 196. 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 239, 240, 380, 379, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 511

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Mad)418; [2006]285ITR402(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Ramasamy, Special Public Prosecutor

ORDERS. Ashok Kumar, J. 1. This Criminal Revision Case as been filed against the order of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (Economic Offences Wing-I), Chennai-8 in M.P. No. 1389 of 2003 in E.O.C.C. No. 179...

V.Thiagarajan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 77, 34, 45(1), 114, 28, 23

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.K.Ramasamy, Adv.

1. The writ petition is directed against the order of the second respondent, Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowment Department, dated 21.12.2010 and the subsequent modification order dated 14.02.2011.2. The petitioner is a President of the Hindu Baktha...

Gopal Engineering Works and Others Vs. C. P. Thangaraj, Second Income- ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1995)124CTR(Mad)403; [1995]211ITR303(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K. Ramasamy

ORDERPRATAP SINGH J. - Accused Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 in C.C. Nos. 231 to 233 of 1984 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Madras-8, have filed these petitions...

The Regional Director, Ministry of Company Affairs and the Registrar o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 95 to 97 and 391 to 394; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 85

Reported in : [2008]141CompCas475(Mad); (2008)2CompLJ116(Mad); 2008(1)CTC273; (2008)1MLJ625; [2008]85STC30(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Ramasamy, Adv.

A.P. Shah, C.J.1. Admit. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent waives service. By consent, the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2. The Regional Director, Ministry of Company Affairs and the Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu...

K.Murugeswari Vs. Tamil Nadu State Election Commission and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Municipalities

Acts : Tamil Nadu Town Panchayats, Third Grade Municipalities, Municipalities and Corporations (Elections) Rules, 2006 - Rule 139; Election Rules, 2006 - Rule 139; Constitution of India - Articles 243-O, 243-ZG, 226; Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1971 - Section 56(2)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.K.Ramasamy, Adv.

1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent, viz., Tamil Nadu State Election Commission, represented by its Secretary, dated 3.1.2011, by which the first respondent by exercising the suo moto powers...

P. Muthusamy Vs. K. Arumugam and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

(Prayer:- This second appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Perundurai made in A.S.No.7 of 2011 dated 12.01.2012 reversing the judgment and decree of...

State Bank of India Vs. The District

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 07.2009 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.O.P.No.23932 of 2002 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9999 and 10000 of 2002 G.Ganapathisubramanian .. Petitioner Versus The Chief Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate, Government of...

J. Jayalalithaa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 16, 16(2), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 17(1), 17A, 17(1A), 17(B), 30, 35, 35(B), 35O, 69, 271(1), 273A, 276C, 276CC, 277 and 279; Income Tax Act - Sections 120B, 139(1), 277 and 278E; Limitation Act, 1974; Mines Act - Sections 66; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190, 190(1), 192, 200-203, 204, 245(2), 309, 397, 397(1), 401, 482 and 483; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227; Wealth Tax Rules - Rule 3(1); Mines Regulations - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3114; (2009)222CTR(Mad)470; [2009]309ITR277(Mad); [2009]179TAXMAN212(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Ramasamy K., Sr. Spl. P.P. for I.T. Cases

ORDERK. Mohan Ram, J.1. Since common questions arise for consideration in the above Criminal Original Petition and in the above Criminal Revision Case both the cases are disposed of by this common order.2. The brief facts...