Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k r sharma · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.134 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 20 2015

Navsansad Vihar Cghs Ltd Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9193/2014 & CM Nos. 20901/2014, 6143, 12214/2015 Date of decision :20. h July, 2015 NAVSANSAD VIHAR CGHS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2013

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~11&12. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 411/2010 Date of decision:29. h August, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2003

Apurba Kumar Sarma and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-19-2003

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Assam Forensic Science Laboratory Service Rules, 1995 - Rule 2, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 13(3)

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Sharma, H. Das and K.C. Sharma, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. BK Sharma, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mr. KP Sharma, learned senior counsel for the respondents.2. This Writ Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.4.2002 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 27 2003

Lok Vikas Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Lok Vikas Finance Corporati ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-27-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446(2)

Reported in : [2003]114CompCas355(Raj); [2003]46SCL146(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Sharma, Adv.

S.K. Keshote, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the application, the reply filed thereto by the official liquidator and the rejoinder filed by the applicant.2. This is an application under Section 446(2) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2004

Nagar Palika and anr. Vs. Tika Ram Charitable Family Trust by Lrs.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-08-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 117 and 117(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 11

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1561; (2005)2UPLBEC1177

Advocate for Respondent : Chandra Shekhar, ;S.C. Pandey, ;D.K.R. Sharma, ;Rahul Sripat, ;M.B. Saxena, ;B.B. Paul and ;Dinesh Goswami, Advs.

S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. Second Appeal in hand has been preferred by the Defendant Appellants i.e. Nagar Palika, Aligarh impugning the judgment and decree dated 28.3.1985 passed by the Lower Appellate Court in Civil Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1952

Mamidi Harihararayulu and ors. Vs. Annavarapu Bangarayya

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195(1), 195(5), 476 and 476B; Madras High Court Criminal Practice Rules - Rule 37

Reported in : AIR1953Mad569; (1953)IMLJ24

Advocate for Respondent : Narayanachar, ;K.R. Sharma, ;A. Subramanian and ;N. Subramanian, Advs. in Nos. 4149 and 7331

Ramaswami, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been placed on the list, subject to the question of the maintainability of the same being decided.2. The facts are: Annavarapu Bangarayya, the decree-holder in O. S. No. 115...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2002

Abid Ali S/O Sayyad Ali Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-25-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 - Sections 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 506, 506B and 509; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3 and 5

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3103; 2003(1)MPLJ598

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Raizada, Govt. Adv.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. Petitioner challenges the order of his externment from Bhopal and contiguous districts Sehore, Rajgarh and Hoshangabad passed under Section 5 of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Adhiniyam')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1970

Nookala Setharamaiah Vs. Kotaiah Naidu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1970

Subject : Property

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rules 28, 28(1A), 57, 57(1) and 57(2);

Reported in : AIR1970SC1354; (1970)2SCC13; [1971]1SCR153

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Nayar, ; K.C. Dua, ; M.C. Setalvad, ;

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeals Nos. 2 1 21 and 2122 of 1969.Appeals from the judgment and order dated July 18, 1969 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in W. P. Nos. 464 and 602 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1972

B.D. Gupta Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-18-1972

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rule 7.2; Punjab Civil Services Rules - Rule 7.3(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164

Reported in : AIR1972SC2472; 1972LabIC1613; (1973)ILLJ26SC; (1973)3SCC149; [1973]2SCR323; 1973(5)LC418(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : V.C. Mahajan and ; R.N. Sachthey, Advs.

A.K. Mukherjea, J.1. This appeal on special leave is from an order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing summarily an appeal directed against a judgment and order of a Single...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1991

Hira Lall and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)

Reported in : (1991)95CTR(Del)225; [1991]190ITR408(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : B. Gupta, Adv.

M.C. Jain C.J.1. By these reference applications, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to state the case in respect of questions Nos. 1 to 15 framed by the petitioner in its reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial