Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Govinda S/O Ganpat Motghare,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR887; 2007CriLJ2564

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Lambat, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J. 1. The State has preferred this appeal against the acquittal of the respondents (hereinafter referred to as ''the accused'') of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian...

Lalabi W/O Mankhan Vs. Dhelullakhan Imamkhan Lodhi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR332; 2003(3)MhLj544

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Lambat, Adv.

V.M. Kanade, J.1. The appellant is the original defendant and the respondent is the original plaintiff. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as 'plaintiff and 'defendant'.2. Brief facts are as under...

National Insurance Co.Ltd. and Another Vs. Parbatabai Alias Parvatabai ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K. R. Lambat

Oral Judgment: 1. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor vehicles Act by original respondent no.1 assailing judgment and award dated 28.03.1994 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandrapur in M.A.C.P.No.44/1988 whereby the...

Vinod Krushnaraoji Wankhede and anr. Vs. Collector

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 11, 73BBB, 73G and 144T; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 7A, 9 and 19; Succession Act - Sections 371; Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 17, 18, 19, 20(1) and 30; Maharashtra Specified Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 1971 - Rule 81; Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1967 - Rule 88; Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 - Rule 26; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 329

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR631

Advocate for Respondent : A.D. Sonak, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 and ;S.A. Gordey, Adv. for respondent No. 2

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. By this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 10th June, 2006 passed by the Election Officer for the purpose of...

Anil Kushabrao Phutane Vs. Madhukar Kushabrao Phutane and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Order 8, Rules 1, 5, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : AIR2006Bom1; 2006(1)ALLMR555; 2006(1)BomCR786; 2006(1)MhLj369

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Dangre, Adv.

P.S. Brahme, J. 1. Heard Mr. K.R. Lambat, Adv. for the appellant.2. Admit.3. Mrs. B. H. Dangre, Adv. waives notice on behalf of the respondents.4. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties by consent for final...

Sakhubai Wd/O Wasudeo Kongre Vs. Bapurao S/O Wasudeo Kongre

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rules 3, 4 and 5

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR770; 2002(1)BomCR349

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Lambat, Adv.

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Mr. K.R. Lambat, Advocate for the respondent. Nobody is present for the appellant even though names of 4 Advocates appear on the memo of appeal.2. This appeal is filed by the original...

Thapar Education Society and Others Vs. Shyam Maroti Bhasarkar and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2(26)

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR399; (1998)IILLJ461Bom; 1998(3)MhLj709

Advocate for Respondent : A.M. Badar, A.G.P., ;V.N. Bagale and ;K.R. Lambar, Advs.

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. These two petitions were disposed of on June 10, 1997 and the orders impugned therein passed by the School Tribunal were set aside and the appeals filed by the respondent-teachers were directed to...

Ganpati Son of Kondbaji Sant Vs. Shri Sant Gulab Baba Shikshan Sanstha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 36(1 and 2)

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR499; 2000(4)BomCR196; 2000(1)MhLj658

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Lambat, Adv. and ;K.S. Dhote, A.G.P.

ORDERD.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Lambat, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, and Shri Dhote, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2. The...

Govind S/O Raoji Katole Vs. Ganpati S/O Tukaramji Khanke Dead Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 100 - Orders 26 and 41 - Rule 1;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendmend) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR610; 2002(1)BomCR124

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Lambat, Adv. for respondents 1-A to 1-E

P.S. Brahme, J.1. This second appeal is preferred by original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 82 of 1977 challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Wardha, in Regular Civil Appeal No....

Rambilas Dinaram Shivlal Vs. (Smt. Shantadevi Sitaram Agrawal,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialBanking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34; Negotiable Instrument Act, 1981 - Sections 79 and 80

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR248; II(2004)BC285; 2004(2)BomCR744

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Daga, and ;K.R. Lambat, Advs. for the Respondent Nos. 1, ;S.C. Mehadia, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

S. T. Kharche, J.1. In both these Second Appeal common questions of law are involved, and therefore, both the appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment.2.The plaintiff is a businessman carrying the business of...