Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k r d karant · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1961

The State of Mysore Vs. K. Srinivasa Upadya

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-11-1961

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 18, 42, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 61, 62, 63, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 85, 85(1), 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117 and 118; Madras Factories Rules

Reported in : AIR1961Kant169; AIR1961Mys169; [1961(3)FLR332]; (1962)IILLJ267Kant

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Karant and ;K.R.D. Karant, Advs.

1. Both these appeals are connoted appeals. Sri K. Srinivasa Upadya, the Ma-nager of the Siddartha Printers, is the respondent in both these appeals. A common question of law arises in these appeals, and it is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1985

Mahalinga Shetty Vs. Krishnaraj

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-31-1985

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 148; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 61

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2194

Advocate for Respondent : K.R.D. Karant, Adv. for R-1 and ;Padubidri Raghavendra Rao, Adv. for R-2 and ;K.T. Mohan, Adv. for R-11

Nesargi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31-1-1975 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Udupi, South Kanara, in Appeal Suit No. 7 of 1963 reversing the Judgment and decree dated 10-10-1962...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1966

V.K. Kangan and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore Represented by the Chief ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-06-1966

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 9 and 17; Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1967Kant133; AIR1967Mys133; (1966)2MysLJ739

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Doddakalegowda for High Court, Special Government Pleader

Somnath Iyer, J.1. In this Writ Petition thirteen persons whose lands were proposed to be acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act call in question the acquisition proceedings which commenced with a preliminary notification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial