Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k nanjundiah · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 02 1958

The Dominion of India and ors. Vs. Premchand Siremal and Co.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-02-1958

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 75, 75(1) and 78; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101

Reported in : AIR1959Kant43; AIR1959Mys43; ILR1958KAR245; (1958)36MysLJ455

Advocate for Respondent : B. Ramachandra Rao, Adv.

1. This second appeal is filed by the Union of India, against the decree and judgment of the learned District Judge, Bellary.2. The plaintiff-respondent is a merchant in Bellary. Messrs. Bhimaji Kapurchand of Bombay despatched a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1969

City Municipal Council, Bellary Vs. Union of India Owning Southern Rai ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-16-1969

Subject : Municipal TaxLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120; Constitution of India - Articles 228, 277, 285 and 285(2); Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 81 and 81(1); Mysore City Municipalities Act, 1933 - Sections 64; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Railways (Local Authorities Taxation) Act, 1941 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(2); Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 113; Madras Elementary Education Act, 1920 - Sections 34; Government of India Act - Sections 154

Reported in : AIR1970Kant37; AIR1970Mys37; ILR1969KAR491; (1969)2MysLJ167

Advocate for Respondent : K. Nanjundiah, Adv.

Somnath Iyer, J.1. In this suit, which has been withdrawn to this Court under Article 228 of the Constitution, from the Court of the Civil Judge, Bellary, in which it was originally instituted, the plaintiff is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1971

T. Muddu Veerappa Sons and K.H. Veeranna Setty Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 73, 74, 74-C and 77; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101

Reported in : AIR1972Kant164; AIR1972Mys164; (1972)1MysLJ96

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Nanjundiah, Adv.

ORDERK. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The question that arises for determination in this Civil revision petition is whether the petitioner-plaintiff must prove negligence or misconduct of the railways in a suit for compensation for the loss of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 29 1962

Gangadhar Gurusiddappa Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-29-1962

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR1963Mys193; ILR1962KAR527

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Mahendra, Adv. ; for K. Nanjundiah, Adv.

T.K. Tukol, J.1. The appellant instituted Special Suit No. 16 of 1954 on 7-6-1954 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hubli (District Dharwar), for three declarations to the effect that the orders of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1952

Abdul Basheer Saheb Vs. Government of Mysore by the Chief Secretary to ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-02-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mysore Railways Act - Sections 61; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77

Reported in : AIR1954Kant57; AIR1954Mys57; ILR1953KAR489; (1954)32MysLJ76

Advocate for Respondent : K. Nanjundiah, Adv.

1. The suit in respect of which this appeal arises was filed for recovery of Rs.1241-10-6 as the value of 107 bags of salt not delivered, along with other claims such as freight paid, notice charges...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1956

Nanjappa Vs. Vimala Devi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-1956

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 23, 24 and 25; Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 36; Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1957Kant44; AIR1957Mys44; ILR1956KAR317

Advocate for Respondent : K. Nanjundiah, Adv.

ORDER1. The Petitioner before this Court filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the Respondent praying for a decree for divorce. The Respondent who is the wife filed an application under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1952

A. Srikantaiah Vs. Bansilal Abirchand and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-08-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 3, Rule 4; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 61; Legal Practitioners Act; Solicitors Act, 1860

Reported in : AIR1952Kant141; AIR1952Mys141

Advocate for Respondent : K. Nanjundiah, Adv.

ORDERBalakrishnayya, J.1. The petitioner is an Advocate of this court who defended respondent 2, one Gulam Ahmed, against whom a creditor's petition in insolvency was filed before the District Judge, Civil Station, Bangalore, in I. P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1961

Veerabhadrappa and ors. Vs. Lingappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-16-1961

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100(1) and 103

Reported in : AIR1963Mys5

Advocate for Respondent : V. Krishna Murthy and ; V.S. Sadasivan, Advs. for Legal Representatives of Respondent 1, ; K. Nanjundiah, Adv. for Respondent 16, ; G.C. Veerappa, Adv. for Respondent 17 and ; B.V. Balaji, Adv. for Re

A. Narayana Pai, J.1. This Second Appeal is by the plaintiffs in Original Suit No. 57 of 1949-50 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Mysore, who lost both in the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2007

Sri D.K. Nanjundaiah S/O Late Kalasaiah Vs. the Chief Army Quality Ass ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-20-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3(1) and 21; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeals) Rules, 1965 - Rule 21

Reported in : ILR2008KAR735; 2008(4)KarLJ33; 2008(1)KCCR502; 2008(1)KCCRSN4; 2008(2)AIRKarR61; 2008(2)AIRKar390; 2008LabIC(NOC)688(Kar)(DB)

Advocate for Respondent : Y. Hariprasad, Adv. for R1 and R3

Ram Mohan Reddy, J.The applicant in OA No. 359/04 aggrieved by the Older dated 28.7.2004 of the Central Administration Tribunal Bangalore, has preferred this writ petition.The factual panorama in a nutshell is:1. The petitioner, a Hindu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial