Advanced Search Results

Ushodaya Enterprises Limited Vs. T.V. Venugopal and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 17, 44, 45, 50, 51, 55, 62 and 72; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 26 - Order 7, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 21, 27, 81, 105 and 106; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules, 1959; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALD723

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.N. Srinivasan and ;Mrs. Kalpana Ekbote, Advs.

ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J 1. These two letters Patent Appeals arise out of a common judgment in CCCA Nos.178 and 180 of 2000 dated 28-12-2000 rendered by a learned single Judge of this Court.2. For the...

Pandurangan and anr. Vs. Dasu Reddy

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 65, 104 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 89, 90 and 92 - Order 34, Rule 5;

Reported in : AIR1973Mad107

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. M.V. Krishnan

1. The auction purchaser is the first appellant. The decree holder is the second appellant. The judgment debtor, respondent herein, filed an application in E. A. 669 of 1969 under Order XXI. Rule 90 Civil P....

S. Ahmed Khan Vs. Turup Mohamed Hayat

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 42, 44, 69(1) and 69(2); Indian Contract Act - Sections 69 and 70

Reported in : AIR1953Kant4; AIR1953Mys4

Advocate for Respondent : S. Govinda Rao, Adv.

1. The plaintiff brought a suit in the Court of the Munsif, Civil Station, for the recovery of Rs. 3,000/- from the defendant. His case was that he and the defendant agreed to run a taxi...

Mrs.Jayalakshmi Nayak, vs Valsa,

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2023/1ST JYAISHTA, 1945 RCREV. NO. 73 OF 2023 AGAINST...

T.V. Venugopal Vs. Ushodaya Enterprises and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 26 - Order 7, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 17, 30, 34, 35, 40, 41, 44, 45, 45(1), 50, 51, 55, 62, 62(1), 72 and 72(2); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 4, 12(3), 27, 105 and 106; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 10(1), 11, 12, 12(1), 12(3), 18, 27(1), 34 and 46 - Schedule - Rules 12 and 26; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules; Specific Relief Act - Sections 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT42

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Sreenivasan, Sr. Adv. for ;Kalpana Ekbote, Adv. in Respondent No. 1 in CCCA No. 180/2000 and ;N.A.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. for ;B. Nalinkumar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in CCCA No. 178/2000

G. Bikshapathy, J.1. Both the C.C.C. As. can be disposed of by a common judgment, as they arise out of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 555 of 1999 on the file of the...

M/S. Cadila Laboratories (P) Ltd., Ahmedabad and Another Vs. M/S. Kama ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 151 - Order 39 - Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 5; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR1991Kant303; ILR1990KAR2576

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

1. Defendants in O.S. 2/88 on the of file of the District Judge. Shimoga (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial Judge')have filed this appeal under O. 43, R. 1(r) of C.P.C. against the order dt. 27-3-1989...

Basavantappa and ors. Vs. Dasappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 138, 142 and 144; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 95

Reported in : AIR1953Kant35; AIR1953Mys35; ILR1953KAR51; (1954)32MysLJ57

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

1. The suit filed by the plaintiffs is lor partition of the plaint schedule properties and for being put in possession of such share as they are entitled to. The plaintiffs purchased the properties in execution...

S.S. Ambe Vs. Eskaylab Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1979

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Srinivasan, Adv.

Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful plaintiff. Itarises in the following circumstances:The plaintiff was an employee of defendant-2 - Eskaylab Limited. Heresigned from the employment on 30-4-1980 allegedly on account of...

United Breweries Ltd. Vs. Khodays Brewing and Distilling Industries Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 27 and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC130(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Srinivasan, ;Mohd. Saibullah and ;A.R. Srinivasa Rao, Advs.

V.G. Sabhahit, J.1. This appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CFC., is directed against the order dated 4.1.1994 in O.S. No. 747/93 rejecting the application I.A-1, filed by the plaintiff for issue of an...

The Commissioner of Income- Tax Vs. Sri C.S. Rajasundaram Chetty,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16 and 16(3)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad480; [1950]18ITR145(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : M. Subbaraya Aiyar and ; K.N. Srinivasan, Advs.

Satyanarayana Rao, J. 1. The short question that is raised in this reference is whether the word 'child' occurring in Section 16 (3) (a), Income-tax Act includes also an illegitimate child. The question as formulated by...