Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k m sahai · Page 1 of about 44 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 10 2002

Hoti Lal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 243F and 243O; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C, 95 and 95(1)

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1761; (2002)3UPLBEC2024

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai and ;R.P. Goyal, Advs. and ;U.N. Sharma, S.C.

R.R. Yadav, J. 1. In the aforesaid two writ petitions, common question of legislative transgression of State Legislature inserting Sub-clause (iii-a) in Clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 95 of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2006

Bhadauria Gram Sewa Sansthan Vs. Asstt. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Allah ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2(i) and 7D; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 49E; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5(1), 7(7) and 7(7A); Central excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A(4); Central Excise Rules - Rule 96ZO(3); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : [2006]148STC356(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M.A. Qazmi, ;K.M. Sahai,; S.P. Kesarwani, Advs. and S.C.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Disagreeing and also doubting the correctness of the law laid down by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Jaya Bhatta Udyog v. State of U.P. (Civil Misc. Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1999

Khalil Ahmad Vs. Revisional Authority/Assistant Sugar Commissioners, N ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-06-1999

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugarcana Purchase Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 3(1) and (1A) and 3B; Uttar Pardesh Sugarcana Purchase Tax Rules, 1961 - Rules 14(1) and 15(1); Uttar Pardesh Khandsari Licence Order, 1967

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC481

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai, S.C.

P.K. Jain, J.1. The petitioner claims that he is owner of crushing unit for crushing sugarcane and he has installed one power crusher of 33 x 46 cm. with four 'Bhattis' Ruhelkhand and one power crusher...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2005

Sameer Ahmad, Son of Shri Ameer Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. Through Princi ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-04-2005

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2992

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai, Adv. and ;C.S.C.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Sameer Ahmad, seeks the following reliefs:-'(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 1996

Devendra Kumar Srivastava and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1996)IILLJ256All

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai, S.C.

P.K. Mukherjee J. 1. In the instant writ petition, the petitioners, have approached this Court, being aggrieved by the promotion of certain junior persons, namely respondents IInd and IIIrd sets, who have been impleaded in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2000

Radha Krishna Singh Vs. Commissioner, Village Development, U.P. and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2863; (2000)3UPLBEC2759

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai, Adv. and ;S.C.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Parvej Alam Ansari, holding brief of Shri H. K. Singh. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri K. M. Sahai, learned standing counsel of the State of U. P.. representing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2000

Mangat Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-06-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Service Regulations - Regulation 351A

Reported in : (2001)1UPLBEC713

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C. and ;K.M. Sahai, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Santosh Kumar, holding brief of Shri Ajit Kumar, the learned Counsel of the petitioner and Shri K.M. Sahai, the learned Standing Counsel of the State of U.P. representing the respondents.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1998

Mohammad Raish Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-30-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975 - Rule 3

Reported in : (1998)2UPLBEC1232

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai, S.C.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Heard Shri R. P. Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri K. M. Sahai, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the writ petition.2. By order dated 15.9.97 learned Standing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2005

Vikrant Tyres Limited Now Known as J.K. Industries Limited Through Its ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-2005

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 21, 21(1) and 21(2); Companies Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4 and 25; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act 1972 - Sections 8; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2006]148STC122(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;K.M. Sahai, Adv.

A.K. Yog, J. 1. All Respondents are represented through Standing Counsel and that the arguments raised at the Bar require no enquiry on facts, we proceed to decide writ petition finally, without calling for Counter and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Menka theater and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 11; Uttar Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2616

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Sahai, S.C.

Prakash Krishna, J. 1. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 23.2.1999, passed by respondent No. 1. The petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm, of which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial