Advanced Search Results

Sarva Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Crompton Greaves Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 44; Factories Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR380; (2002)ILLJ190Bom

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Naik and ;Anjali Purav, Advs.

R. J. Kochar, J. 1. In its efforts to get butter for the bread of the 120 female workers, the Petitioner Union appears to have caused to disappear the whole loaf of the bread itself. These...

Saint Gobain Sekurit India Ltd. Vs. Kuyesh Durjan Yadav and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith in both the petitions. Respondents waive service. Taken up for final disposal by consent of the parties. 2. The issue involved in both these petitions is, whether it...

Padmini R. Bijoor and ors. Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1)

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR321; (2002)IIILLJ891Bom

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania and ;S.U. Uttam, Advs. i/b., Mulla & Mulla Craigle Blunt & Caroe for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.C. Master and ;H.V. Mehta, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. This petition has been filed by one Capt. R.M. Bijoor, the original petitioner, to challenge the order dated December 17, 1986 passed by respondent No. 1 dismissing him from their services. The...

Shaukat Ali and anr. Vs. Economic Engineering Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR239

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Naidu and ;Jay Choksy, Advs., i/b., C.R. Naidu and Co. for respondents No. 1 to 1-E and ;K.S. Bapat, Adv. for respondent No. 2

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records.2. The petitioners are challenging the Awards dated 24-3-1999, passed in Reference (IDA) Nos. 493 of 1987 and 685 of 1989 by the Labour...

Hindustan Lever Research Centre Employees' Union Vs. Hindustan Lever L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33B and 39; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act - Sections 45; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rule 18; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR734; 2008(2)BomCR831; [2008(117)FLR1112]; (2008)ILLJ681Bom

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Naik and ;S.P. Salkar, Advs.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith.This petition challenges the order of the President of the Industrial Court refusing to transfer Reference (IT) No. 21/2001 from the file of the Tribunal who is presently seized with the...

Shri Waman Narayan Trimbakkar, Mahila Griha Vastu Bhandar Vs. Crompton ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act - Sections 28; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR172

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., Salgaonkar & Co. for Respondent No. 1

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the Industrial Court dismissing his complaint filed under Items 5, 6, 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU &...

Welcome Group Searock Vs. Tryambak Karbhari Wagh and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 13A and 32; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : 2003(6)BomCR52; (2003)IIILLJ916Bom; 2003(4)MhLj552

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Bhat, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in W.P. No. 1085 of 2000 and ;K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., ;Sanjay P. Dhulapkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 1903 of 2000

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Since common questions of law and facts arisein both these petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by thiscommon judgment.2. The issues involved in both these petitions are, one relating...

Mr. Motiram Lorya Patil Vs. Tata Electric Companies, Transmission Divi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, 33(2) and 33C(2); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 4B and 4C; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) (Amendment) Act, 1978

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ375Bom

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Naik, ;S.P. Salkar and ;Agnel Carneira, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe for Respondent No. 1

V.M. Kanade, J.1. By this petition which is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging judgment and order passed by the Labour Court under Section 33-2(c) of the...

Adil K. Patel Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, (MRTU & PULP Act), 1972 - Sections 2 and 18; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 62

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR441; (1997)IIILLJ164Bom; 1995(1)MhLj574

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., ;M/s. Salgaonkar

1. The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether an employer can ask his employee to forego his employment with it and accept the offer of employment with some other employer and...

Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union Vs. the G ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(9), 2(11), 3, 3(1), 21, 22 and 25; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Shop and Establishments Act; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Dock Workers Act, 1949 Dock Workers Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, The Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 31

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR26; 2006(5)BomCR490; (2007)ILLJ965Bom

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Rele, ;R.P. Rele, ;Vinod Tayade, ;Piyush Shah and ;N.G.Chitre, Advs. for Respondent No. 2, ;S.R. Nargolkar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and ;K.M. Naik, Adv., i/b., S.P. Dhulapkar, Adv. for

D.K. Deshmukh, J. 1. The Hon'ble Chief Justice has constituted this Bench because the Division Bench of this Court has referred following question for consideration by the Larger Bench:In view of the statutory definition of the...