Advanced Search Results
indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-16-1992
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 5, 10, 12, 14-18, 25, 29, 32, 38, 73, 77(3), 87(2), 118, 141, 145(1), 146(1), 148(5), 162, 166(3), 176(2), 187(3), 208, 225, 226, 227(2),; Civil Rights Act, 1964; Communications Act, 1934; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 5
AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217
ORDER1. Judgment of The Chief Justice, M.N. Venkatachallah, A.M. Ahmadi and B.P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ. Delivered by B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.Forty and three years ago was founded this republic with the fourfold objective...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Kumar S/O Ram Bharose vs.state
Delhi
Apr-11-2017
Land Acquisition
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : April 11, 2017 CRL.A. 842/2002 MANJU DEVI Through: Mr.Imran Khan, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Bharose & Anr. Vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Apr-11-2017
Land Acquisition
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : April 11, 2017 CRL.A. 842/2002 MANJU DEVI Through: Mr.Imran Khan, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Manju Devi vs.state
Delhi
Apr-11-2017
Land Acquisition
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : April 11, 2017 CRL.A. 842/2002 MANJU DEVI Through: Mr.Imran Khan, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGuddu Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-23-2010
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 299, 302, 326, 392 and 397; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313
Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel and; Laxmi Chauhan, Adv.
Ajit Bharihoke, J.1. Above appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 23.12.1999 in Sessions Case No. 7/98, FIR No. 240/98, P.S. Mangol Puri. In terms of the judgment, the appellants Sanju and Mukesh have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Om Vs. State
Delhi
Mar-11-2005
Criminal
Arms Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 173
118(2005)DLT608; 2005(81)DRJ422
Anil Soni, Addl. Public Prosecutor
R.S. Sodhi, J.1. This appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 18th July, 2000, in Sessions Case No. 85/99, arising out of FIR No. 478/1997, Police Station Vivek Vihar, under Section 302/34 IPC, whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak Mohan Sethi Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. and anr
Delhi
May-06-2014
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h March, 2014 Date of decision :6. h May, 2014 % + LPA3082013 DEEPAK MOHAN SETHI Through ..... Appellant Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantoshanand Avdoot @ Ghanshyam Prashad and anr. Vs. State
Delhi
Aug-14-2014
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h NOVEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :14. h AUGUST, 2014 + CRL.A. 443/1976 SANTOSHANAND AVDOOT @ GHANSHYAM PRASHAD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Cement Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Allahabad
Apr-22-1996
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 11 and 35(EE)
1997(89)ELT678(All)
Shishir Kumar, Standing Counsel
K.L. Sharma, J.1. Heard Mr. Dilip Gupta learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shishir Kumar learned Standing counsel for the respondents. 2. In view of the fact that nine Writ Petition Nos. 1785/93, 1786/93, 1787/93,1788/93,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajishi Foam therm and Pack Vs. Cegat and anr.
Allahabad
Nov-02-1995
Excise
1996(63)LC188(Allahabad)
K.L. Sharma, J.1. Heard Shri A.P. Mathur ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shishir Kumar ld. Standing Counsel for Central Excise and perused the Writ Petition.2. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »