Advanced Search Results

Dhondu Hanmant Reshim Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another and Ravindr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997(3)ALLMR550; 1997(3)BomCR153; (1997)2BOMLR344; 1997CriLJ3982; 1997(3)MhLj344

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Tated, A.G.P.

1. This Contempt Petition has been filed by Dhondu Hanmant Reshim praying therein that the contemnors may be held guilty of civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully, knowingly and intentionally flouting...

Shivprasad Shankarlal Pardeshi, Since Deceased by His Heirs Vs. Leelab ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 70 and 72(1 and 4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 4, 96 and 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 59 and 61; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 18, 20 and 21; Saurashtra Rent Control Act, 1951 - Sections 27 and 28; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 104; Punjab Courts Act, 1918 - Sections 41; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 77

Reported in : AIR1998Bom131; 1998(1)ALLMR393; 1998(2)BomCR744; (1998)1BOMLR822; 1998(1)MhLj444

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Kumbhakoni, for the heirs of original, Adv. and ;K.K. Tated, Assistant Government Pleader for Charity Commissioner, and State of Maharashtra

ORDERArvind V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri R. S. Apte for the heirs of Appellant No. 1, Shri A. A. Kumbhakoni for the heirs of original respondent No.1. Shri K.K. Tated, Assistant Government...

Mr. Sudhakar Govind Rave Vs. Maharashtra Agro Industries.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUDGMENT (PER K.K. TATED, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. 3. By consent heard forthwith. 4. The Petitioner, by this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the...

Shree Ambika Trading Corporation Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 20(5), 36, 36(3), 38(5), 43, 55, 55(2), 55(3), 55(6), 57, 61 and 62; ;Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Section 9, 9(2) and 9(2A); ;Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy Amendment and Validation) Act, 1999

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Sharma, AGP

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for rival parties.2. The Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, Mumbai vide its order dated 21.06.2002 for the assessment year 1992-1993, in exercise of powers under Section 61 of the Bombay...

Hanmabai W/o Iranna Patil Deceased through her LR's Dattatraya S/o Ira ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9 and 18

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR380; 2009(4)MhLj805

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Dound, A.G.P.

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard Mr. Gorde Patil, learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. S.P. Dound, learned A.G.P. for the Respondents.2. The present First Appeals preferred by the Appellants/original claimants against the Judgment and award dated...

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Muhammad Masud Muhammad MahsIn B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 35 and 37; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1881 - Rule 7A, 7B and 7C; Bombay Salt Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 17; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 11, 18 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 100 and 110; Constitution of India - Article 294; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 99 and 100; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 31 and 32;

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR314

Advocate for Respondent : V.A. Bobade, Sr. C.,; A.S. Oka,; V.A. Gangal, ;N.V. Gangal, ; S.M. Gorwadkar and ;Vijay Patil, Advs.,; D.V. Chandrachud and ;Abhay S. Oka, Advs., i/b., Bothawalla Co.,; S.H. Doctor and ;S.K. Cooper, A

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. This appeal and the cross appeal are filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd June 1993 passed by the learned District Judge, Raigad, Alibag in Land Acquisition Reference No. 184 of 1986....

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Moonlight Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 3A, 13AA, 32, 36(3), 41(1), 57 and 61(1); ;Works Contract Act, 1985; ;Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Section 20; ;Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; ;Constitution of India - Articles 286, 366 and 366(29A)

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Joshi, Adv.

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties.2. This reference, at the instance of the Applicant/Revenue, is made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, Mumbai under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax...

Uttamrao S/O Santukrao Kulkarni and Nagorao S/O Santukrao Kulkarni, Di ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6, 9, 18 and 23

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR143; 2009(4)MhLj841

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Daund, A.G.P. for Respdt. Nos. 1 and 2

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Present First Appeal is preferred by the the appellants - original claimants challenging the judgment and award dated 19-10-1993 passed by IInd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division,...

Bilkis Bano W/O Abdul Razzak Through Her Power of Attorney, Mohd. Abdu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6, 12(2) and 18; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR909

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Dound, A.G.P.

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard Mr. Khader, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and Mr. Dound, learned A.G.P. appearing on behalf of the Respondents.2. Present Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant/ original claimant against...

Shobha Mhatardev Lomte Vs. Mhatardev Tukaram Lomte

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9, 10 and 24

Reported in : AIR2009Bom160

Advocate for Respondent : L.B. Palod, Adv.

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Present Second Appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 24-08-2006 passed by the 4th Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Ahmednagar R.C.A....