Advanced Search Results

Rohit Gera Vs. Pune Cantonment Board Golibar Maidan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. K.J. Presswala

A.S. Chandurkar, J. 1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges notice dated 21st May, 2009 issued by respondent No.1 Pune Cantonment Board issued under Section 248 (1) of...

Mathulla Verghese and anr. Vs. Mrs. Vijaya Rajaratnam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rules 3 & 8

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR205; (2001)1BOMLR405

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.R. Irani and ;Ms. S. Shridharan, Advs.

ORDERD. G. Deshpande, J.1. This notice of motion has been taken out by the plaintiffs under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 to record that the Suit No. 987 of 1996 i.e....

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ajit Kumar Kar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 3(1), 9(21), 33, 44, 49, 55A and 70; Government of India Rules; Indian Railway Establishment Code - Rules 2301 and 2544; Railway Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1973

Reported in : AIR2009SC34; (2008)4CALLT80(SC); JT2008(5)SC286; 2008(6)SCALE296; (2008)11SCC591; 2008AIRSCW6886; 2008(3)Supreme93

Advocate for Respondent : K.V. Vishwanathan, ; Hiren Dasan, ; Anandajyoti Dasgupta

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 25th November, 2004 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in MAT No. 171 of 2002 whereby...

Kalpataru Builders and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(2), 181(3), 181(4), 181(6), 181(A), 185, 185(1) and 274; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR751; 2005(6)BomCR787

Advocate for Respondent : Y.R. Mishra, ;D.A. Dubey and ;T.C. Kaushik, Advs. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 6 and ;K.J. Presswala, Adv. i/b., Mulla and Mulla Craigie Blunt and Caroe for Respondents Nos. 4 and 5

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This writ petition invoking Article 226 of the Constitution is filed by the assignees of the original lessees of a property owned by the Union of India situated in the Pune Cantonment Board...

Basawaraj Sheelwant and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board of Pune and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 119, 282, 282(4) and 284(1); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 46

Reported in : AIR2006Bom89; 2006(3)ALLMR75; 2006(2)BomCR81; 2006(2)MhLj14

Advocate for Respondent : K.J. Presswala, Adv., i/b., Mulla and Mulla CB and C for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Y.S. Bhate, Adv., i/b., T.C. Kaushik, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. A 'pay and park' scheme, hereinafter referred to as 'the said scheme', introduced by respondent No. 1-the Cantonment Board of Pune, is impugned in the instant writ petition filed by the four businessmen,...

Madhukar Gaikwad and Vijayanand B. Bhalshankar Vs. General Insurance C ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR28; 2004(5)BomCR261; 2004(3)MhLj759

Advocate for Respondent : K.J. Presswala and ;Vidhya Bhatt, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla & CBC

V.G. Palshikar, J. 1. By this petition the petitioners have claimed direction that the respondents be directed to grant promotion to the petitioners with retrospective effect as they were wrongly shown in the seniority list.2. The...

Sekhsaria Exports Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Contract Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR917; 2004(1)MhLj415

Advocate for Respondent : A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel, ;K.J. Presswala and ;R.C. Master, Advs.

V. C. Daga, J.1. This petition is directed against the action of the respondents seeking to encash the bank guarantees furnished by the petitioners to perform their part of obligation arising from the contracts, if allotted....

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 48 and 120; Mormugao Port (Shipment of Ore and Pellets from Mechanised Ore Handling Plant at berth no. 9 and related matters) Regulations, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 12, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 134 to 137 and 149; Limitation Act - Sections 3, 5, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 64A and 87; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 527; General Clauses Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 131; Excise Act; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Railways Act; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27

Advocate for Respondent : K.J. Presswala, ; U.A. Rana, ; Biju Mattam and ;

Ashok Bhan, J.1. These appeals by grant of leave are directed against the common judgment and order of affirmation passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in First Appeal No.27 of 1992 and appeal...

Hitesh Shantilal Mehta Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR716; 1993CriLJ1729

Advocate for Respondent : K. Parasaran,;T.R. Andhyarujina,;K.J. Presswala and;M.M. Varma, Advs.

Mrs. Sujata Manohar, J. 1. Leave to amend in terms of the draft. Amendment to be carried out within one week. This petition has been filed by one Hitesh S. Mehta to challenge the constitutional validity...

Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Companies Act V ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4, 7(4), 16(1), 16(2), 23, 33 and 34

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR418; 2007(4)ARBLR385(Bom); 2007(4)MhLj230

Advocate for Respondent : Sarvasri D.R. Zaiwalla, Sr. Adv., ;K.J. Presswala, Adv., i/b., Eastley Lam and Co.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This appeal arises from the order dated 30-4-1998 passed in Arbitration Petition No. 122 of 1998. By the impugned order, the appellants' petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...