Advanced Search Results
Madhao Pandurang and anr. Vs. Yeshwant
Mumbai
Mar-16-1973
Tenancy
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 21
AIR1974Bom12; ILR1974Bom752; 1973MhLJ771
K.G. Chendke and ;V.R. Deopujari, Advs.
1. This is a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment of the Second Extra Assistant Judge, Nagpur, in Civil Appeal No. 55 of 1963 dated 19-2-1964, allowing the appeal filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabarao and ors. Vs. Hanumant
Mumbai
Sep-20-1957
Family
Hindu Law
AIR1959Bom75; ILR1959Bom19
K.G. Chendke, ;M.R. Bobde, Advs. in F.A. No. 13 of 1950 and ;G.R. Mudholkar, Adv.
D.V. Vyas, J. 1. These two first appeals Nos. 13 and 65 of 1950 arise out of a judgment and decree passed by the First Additional District Judge, Amravati, in Civil Suit No. 5-A of 1948....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandhari Ramji Timade and ors. Vs. Jagdamba Devi Deosthan, Nagpur and ...
Mumbai
Oct-12-1971
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultrual Lands (vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 - Sections 100 (3) and 107(1)
AIR1972Bom123; ILR1972Bom1074; 1971MhLJ1045
K.G. Chendke, Adv.
ORDER1. This Petition Challenges the order dated 17-6-1970 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Revenue revision No. Ten-A-478 of 1969. The facts leading to this petition are briefly these: The respondent No. 1 Jagdamba Devi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jana and anr. Vs. Parvati
Mumbai
Nov-19-1957
FamilyProperty
Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2)
AIR1958Bom346; (1958)60BOMLR553
K.G. Chendke, Adv.
1. This second appeal raises a vexed question of considerable importance and the question relates to the construction of the principal provisions of the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937, which introduced important and for-reaching...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankarlal Laxminarayan Rathi and ors. Vs. Gangabisen Maniklal Sikchi ...
Mumbai
Feb-19-1972
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 2 and 4
AIR1972Bom326; 1972MhLJ738
A.S. Bobde, ;B.A. Udhoji and ;M.L. Vaidya, Advs. in F.A.F.O.D. No. 12 of 1970, ;P. P. Deo, W.G. Deo, ;V.R. Manohar and ;K.G. Chendke in F.A.F.O.D. No. 19 of 1970
Kotwal, C.J. (This reference to a Full Bench has been occasioned by a conflict of decisions of this Court in Channappa Girimalappa v. Bagalkot Bank : AIR1942Bom338 and Rama Kallappa Pujari v. Saidappa Sidrama Pujari AIR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamcharan RamdIn Ahir Vs. Resident Deputy Collector with Rent Control ...
Mumbai
Aug-08-1970
ConstitutionTenancy
Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(5) and 31; Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Letting of Accommodation Act, 1946 - Sections 1(3) and 2; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106
AIR1971Bom203; 1970MhLJ975
C.S. Dharmadhikari, A.G.P. for ;Adv.-General and ;K.G. Chendke, Adv.
ORDER1. This petition raises an important question regarding the validity of Clause 13(3)(vi) of the Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949. This Order has been made by the State Government...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Keshavlal Amrutlal Ozha and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-21-1957
Property
Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 24(4), 74 and 79; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438
AIR1958Bom243; (1958)60BOMLR551; 1958CriLJ756; ILR1959Bom358
K.G. Chendke and ;G.N. Hastak, Advs.
ORDER1. This case has been reported under Section 438 of the Criminal P.C., by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chanda.2. The relevant facts are briefly these: On 18-10-1955, there was a fatal accident in the Mahakali Coal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrajvallabh Shankarlal Vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur and 3 ...
Mumbai
Apr-10-1968
Property
Tenancy Laws; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 18, 20, 21 and 33
AIR1969Bom218; (1969)71BOMLR111; ILR1969Bom819; 1968MhLJ736
C.S. Dharmadhikari, Asstt. Govt. Pleader and ;K.G. Chendke, Adv.
ORDER1. The only question that is involved in the present petition is whether the finding which has been given by the Sub-Divisional Officer in the proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›