Advanced Search Results

Jayant L. Shah Vs. Naranji Lalji Khona

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 15A and 28; ;Presidency Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 41

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR653; 2006(6)MhLj584

Advocate for Respondent : U.K. Shah, Adv. i/by ;K.D. Shah, Adv.

S.U. Kamdar, J. 1.. The present suit is filed for a decree of declaration that the defendant has no right, title or interest to carry on the business of Messrs. Narshi Hansraj or any other business...

Annabai Devram Kini and ors. Vs. Mithilal Daisangar Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR2002Bom332; 2002(3)ALLMR364; 2002(4)BomCR533; 2002(3)MhLj507

Advocate for Respondent : K.D. Shah, Adv. in Appeal Nos. 448 and 449/2001 in Chamber Summons No. 755/2000 in Suit No. 3649/2000

A.P. Shah, J.1. The short question that arises in these two appeals is whether the suit for specific performance of the contract abates in its entirety when one of the plaintiffs being party to a joint,...

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Precious Finance Investment Pvt. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 16, 151 and 153 - Order 6, Rules 17 and 18 - Order 8, Rules 1 and 9 - Order 20, Rule 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR771; 2006(6)BomCR510

Advocate for Respondent : Rajini Iyer, Adv., i/b., ;K.D.Shah, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the respondents. 2. The order dated 4.3.2006 rejecting the application for amendment of written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

Manhar Shivji Shethia and Others Vs. Lilavati Madhusudan Shethia and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 59, 60, 70, 71, 73 and 74; Constitution of India - Articles 75 and 226; English Trust Act, 1925 - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR433; 2000(1)BomCR817

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. B.M. Kulkarni i/b, ;Haria and Co., ;Ms. Anjali Chandurkar, ;Ms. U.K. Shah i/b, ;K.D. Shah, ;A.Y. Bookwala and ;Z.A. Jariwala i/b. ;Thakore Jariwala and Associates, Advs.

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioners-beneficiaries of the trust have approached this Court for reliefs against the original respondents 1 and 2. During the course of the proceedings, respondent No. 1 expired and his legal heirs have...

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Mulangi Krishnaswamy Ashok Kumar a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 482; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6 and 10; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 9(4) and 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 25, 34, 43, 109, 120-A, 120-B, 313, 366, 405, 409, 411, 415, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1 and 2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 10 and 114; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Article 18; Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR126; 1999(2)BomCR771; (1998)3BOMLR228

Advocate for Respondent : Girish Kulkarni and ;S. Mohan, Advs., ;H.J. Thakkar, ;K.D. Shah and ;Mrs. Maya Sarkar, Advs. i/b ;Madhukar Munim & Co. and ;R.D. Ovalekar and ;M.P. Rao, Advs. i/b ;Purnanand & Co.

ORDERS.N. Variava, J.1. This Court was established because large amounts were siphoned out from Banks and Financial Institutions into private pockets. The manner by which monies have been siphoned out are many. This case indicates how...

P.R. Nerurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(4), 3(3) and 4(3); Cloth Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers, (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1971

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR439

Advocate for Respondent : K.D. Ranadive, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 in C.A. No. 751 of 1982, ; K.D. Shah and ; U.K. Shah, Advs., for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in C.A. No. 751 of 1982, ; C.K. Tuli, Adv., for respondent Nos. 2 to

M.G. Chaudhari, J.1. As both the appeals involve common questions they can be conveniently disposed of by this judgment.Facts of Appeal No. 751 of 19822. Upon a complaint instituted by the appellant Mr. P.R. Nerurkar, an...

Gangaram Sakharam Dhuri Since Deceased Through L.R. Vishnu and ors. Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15(1); Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17; Indian Registration (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 17(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 6; Mitakshara Law

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR816; 2007(5)BomCR306; 2007(5)MhLj136

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. Bharucha, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 and ;K.D. Shah, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

Abhay S. Oka, J.1. I have heard the submissions of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties on the last date and today the Appeal is kept for dictation of Judgment. The original appellant is the...

Chawla Highway Carriers, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(87)ECC350

1. This set of time Appeals arise out of the same Order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay-III. All these appeals are decided in this common order.2. Show Cause Notice dated 4.6.1990 was issued...

Commissioner's Report Canara Bank Vs. Bombay Alloys and Castings and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 1, 2 and 84; High Court Rules - Rule 547

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR58

Advocate for Respondent : Madhav Jamdar, ;Sumedha Rao and ;Rumana Bagebdi, Advs. for Defendant No. 3

Roshan Dalvi, J.1. This Chamber Summons has been taken out by the Applicant who has sought to purchase the suit property initially mortgaged by the Defendant in the suit in favour of the Plaintiff Bank and...

Nandinee Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2A and 7A

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ810Bom

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Kamik, Adv.

P.V. Kakade, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking to set aside and quash the enquiry and order dated November 29, 1989 held under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous...