Advanced Search Results
Ct. A. Ct. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. Ct. A. Ct. Subramanian Chettiar an ...
Chennai
Dec-14-1951
ArbitrationFamily
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 21, 25, 23, 30 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 - Order 6, Rule 7 - Order 8, Rule 9 - Order 20, Rule 18 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 32, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 5; International Law; Hindu Law
AIR1953Mad492; (1952)2MLJ524
K. Bhashyam Aiyangar, Adv.
Venkatarama Aiyar, J.1. 'C. M. A. No. 210 of 1946:-- 'This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the judgment and order in I. A. No. 18 of 1945 in O. S. No. 91 of 1941...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.M.S. Kumarappa Chettiar Vs. the Official Receiver
Chennai
Aug-12-1949
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
AIR1950Mad216
N. Rajagopala Iyengar and ;K. Bhashyam, Advs.
Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. This is an appeal against the refusal of leave to file a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a single Judge in second appeal. The appellant was the respondent in C. M....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Sambandhan Vs. Regional Traffic Superintendent Southern Rly. Tiruch ...
Chennai
May-02-1958
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2)
AIR1959Mad68; (1959)IILLJ613Mad
K. Rajah Aiyar, Adv. for ;C. Govindaraja Aiyangar, Adv. and ;K. Bhashyam, Adv. for ;T. Ramalingan, Adv.
P.V. Rajamannar, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of Rajagopalan J., in W. P. No. 255 of 1956 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the appellant before us. The facts which led...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Mr. Hayles, Editor of The Mail and anr.
Chennai
Aug-27-1954
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 15; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 30 and 30(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1962 - Sections 3
AIR1955Mad1; 1955CriLJ1
Mr. Bhashyam
Mack J. 1. As Special Industrial Tribunal appointed by the Government of Madras, I adjudicated, while a sitting Judge of this Court, the disputes between the managements and workers of malgamation Ltd. Madras, in their eleven...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Lakshmindra theertha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt and anr. Vs. the C ...
Chennai
Dec-13-1951
Trusts and SocietiesConstitution
Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 20, 21, 25(4), 26, 28, 29, 30(2), 31, 53, 54, 55(2), 56, 58(3), 59, 63 to 69, 70, 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 76, 76(1), 78, 89 and 99; Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1927; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 25, 26, 27, 204, 226, 245 and 246; ;Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 1(2); Hindu Law
AIR1952Mad613; (1952)IMLJ557
Adv. General, ;M. Seshachalapathi and ;T.K. Raman Nambisan, Advs.
1. (C. M. P. No. 2591 of 1951):--This and the other connected petitions relating to the Guruvayur temple and the Chidambaram temple were heard together as they all raised the question of the validity of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNatesa Pillai Vs. Govindasami Pathan and anr.
Chennai
Aug-27-1929
Civil
AIR1930Mad4
Anantakrishna Ayyar, J.1. This second appeal raises a question of some importance under Section 73, Civil P.C.2. The plaintiff is the appellant in the second appeal. Defendant 2, Govindasami obtained a money decree in O.S. No,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Govinda Reddy and ors.
Karnataka
Sep-20-1957
CriminalConstitution
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 174, 197, 268, 269, 269(1), 269(4), 286, 289, 340, 340(1), 342, 344, 367, 374 and 540; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 20, 20(3), 22 and 22(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 71, 120B, 161, 165, 165A, 302, 307, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457, 459 and 460; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 27, 45, 73, 114 and 133; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)
AIR1958Kant150; AIR1958Mys150; 1958CriLJ1489
H. Hombe Gowda, J.1. These two appeals are against the judgment dated the 7th November, 1956 of the Principal Sessions Judge, Bangalore Division, in Bangalore Sessions Case No. 29 of 1956 convicting and sentencing all the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVaithilinga Aiyaswami Aiyar Vs. the District Board of Tanjore Represen ...
Chennai
Jul-16-1929
Civil
AIR1930Mad43; 121Ind.Cas.601; (1929)57MLJ510
ORDERAnantakrishna Aiyar, J.1. The question that has been referred to me is, what is the amount of Court-fee payable in respect of a Memorandum of Second Appeal preferred by a ryot in a suit filed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaruppu Goundan and ors. Vs. Sellammal and ors.
Chennai
Aug-12-1958
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law
AIR1959Mad279; (1959)1MLJ173
D. Ramaswami Iyengar and ;P.S. Kailasam, Advs.
1. The only question in this appeal against the judgment of Rajagopalan, J., in A. S. No. 126 of 1949 is whether an alienation by a Hindu widow is binding on the reversioners. The properties in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Thambiran Padayachi and ors. Vs. the State of Madras Represented by ...
Chennai
Nov-03-1951
PropertyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 31(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6 and 17; Madras Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1948; Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932
AIR1952Mad756; (1952)2MLJ208
Adv. General, i/b., State Counsel and Govt. Pleader
1. These are petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of various notifications issued by the State of Madras under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, I of 1894,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »