Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k bhashyam · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 14 1951

Ct. A. Ct. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. Ct. A. Ct. Subramanian Chettiar an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-14-1951

Subject : ArbitrationFamily

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 21, 25, 23, 30 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 - Order 6, Rule 7 - Order 8, Rule 9 - Order 20, Rule 18 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 32, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 5; International Law; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1953Mad492; (1952)2MLJ524

Advocate for Respondent : K. Bhashyam Aiyangar, Adv.

Venkatarama Aiyar, J.1. 'C. M. A. No. 210 of 1946:-- 'This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the judgment and order in I. A. No. 18 of 1945 in O. S. No. 91 of 1941...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1949

K.M.S. Kumarappa Chettiar Vs. the Official Receiver

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-12-1949

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad216

Advocate for Respondent : N. Rajagopala Iyengar and ;K. Bhashyam, Advs.

Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. This is an appeal against the refusal of leave to file a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a single Judge in second appeal. The appellant was the respondent in C. M....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1958

A. Sambandhan Vs. Regional Traffic Superintendent Southern Rly. Tiruch ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-02-1958

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR1959Mad68; (1959)IILLJ613Mad

Advocate for Respondent : K. Rajah Aiyar, Adv. for ;C. Govindaraja Aiyangar, Adv. and ;K. Bhashyam, Adv. for ;T. Ramalingan, Adv.

P.V. Rajamannar, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of Rajagopalan J., in W. P. No. 255 of 1956 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the appellant before us. The facts which led...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 1954

In Re: Mr. Hayles, Editor of The Mail and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-1954

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 215 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 15; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 30 and 30(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1962 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1955Mad1; 1955CriLJ1

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhashyam

Mack J. 1. As Special Industrial Tribunal appointed by the Government of Madras, I adjudicated, while a sitting Judge of this Court, the disputes between the managements and workers of malgamation Ltd. Madras, in their eleven...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1951

Sri Lakshmindra theertha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt and anr. Vs. the C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1951

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesConstitution

Acts : Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 20, 21, 25(4), 26, 28, 29, 30(2), 31, 53, 54, 55(2), 56, 58(3), 59, 63 to 69, 70, 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 76, 76(1), 78, 89 and 99; Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1927; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 25, 26, 27, 204, 226, 245 and 246; ;Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 1(2); Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1952Mad613; (1952)IMLJ557

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General, ;M. Seshachalapathi and ;T.K. Raman Nambisan, Advs.

1. (C. M. P. No. 2591 of 1951):--This and the other connected petitions relating to the Guruvayur temple and the Chidambaram temple were heard together as they all raised the question of the validity of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1929

Natesa Pillai Vs. Govindasami Pathan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-27-1929

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930Mad4

Anantakrishna Ayyar, J.1. This second appeal raises a question of some importance under Section 73, Civil P.C.2. The plaintiff is the appellant in the second appeal. Defendant 2, Govindasami obtained a money decree in O.S. No,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1957

In Re: Govinda Reddy and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-20-1957

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 174, 197, 268, 269, 269(1), 269(4), 286, 289, 340, 340(1), 342, 344, 367, 374 and 540; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 20, 20(3), 22 and 22(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 71, 120B, 161, 165, 165A, 302, 307, 380, 392, 394, 397, 457, 459 and 460; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 27, 45, 73, 114 and 133; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1958Kant150; AIR1958Mys150; 1958CriLJ1489

H. Hombe Gowda, J.1. These two appeals are against the judgment dated the 7th November, 1956 of the Principal Sessions Judge, Bangalore Division, in Bangalore Sessions Case No. 29 of 1956 convicting and sentencing all the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1929

Vaithilinga Aiyaswami Aiyar Vs. the District Board of Tanjore Represen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-16-1929

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930Mad43; 121Ind.Cas.601; (1929)57MLJ510

ORDERAnantakrishna Aiyar, J.1. The question that has been referred to me is, what is the amount of Court-fee payable in respect of a Memorandum of Second Appeal preferred by a ryot in a suit filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1958

Karuppu Goundan and ors. Vs. Sellammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-12-1958

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1959Mad279; (1959)1MLJ173

Advocate for Respondent : D. Ramaswami Iyengar and ;P.S. Kailasam, Advs.

1. The only question in this appeal against the judgment of Rajagopalan, J., in A. S. No. 126 of 1949 is whether an alienation by a Hindu widow is binding on the reversioners. The properties in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1951

P. Thambiran Padayachi and ors. Vs. the State of Madras Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-1951

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 31(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6 and 17; Madras Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1948; Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932

Reported in : AIR1952Mad756; (1952)2MLJ208

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General, i/b., State Counsel and Govt. Pleader

1. These are petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of various notifications issued by the State of Madras under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, I of 1894,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial