Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k b s rajan · Page 1 of about 521 results (0.388 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 19 2026

Usha Anand vs Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2026

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Richa Dhawan, Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Mr. Yashita Jain

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11139/2021 USHA ANAND .....Petitioner Through: Dr. K.B.S. Rajan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mahesh Kumar and Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2024

The Union of Public Service Commission vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-22-2024

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 12626 OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2014

Dr.T.Anithakumary Vs. Univrsity of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-27-2014

Subject : Right to Information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE27H DAY OF AUGUST20145TH BHADRA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8875 of 2011 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- DR.T.ANITHAKUMARY, AGED48YEARS, D/O.LATE M.S.THANKAPPAN, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 28 2025

P.B.Rajahamsam Vs S.Narayanan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-28-2025

2025:MHC:2741IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 24.07.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 28.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.A.Nos.1381 and 1382 of 2022, W.P.No.13027 of 2021, W.P.No.12955 of 2022 and W.P.No.24729...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2011

T. Muralidharan Vs. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Oct-18-2011

Subject : Education

DR. K.B.S. RAJAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. When this case came up for hearing, counsel for the applicant submitted that this case is identical to another O.A.748/2010 and the arguments advanced in the other case may be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2009

RollIn Fernandez and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by Secretar ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : May-01-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dr. K B S Rajan, Judicial Member The Petitioners, nine in number are working as Senior Telecom Office Assistants and through this petition, they claim stepping up of their pay at par with juniors, the latter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2009

K.P. Mohammed Manikfan Vs. the Administrator, Union Territory of Laksh ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Apr-17-2009

Subject : Education

Hon'ble Dr. K B S Rajan, Judicial Member Seniority is the issue in this case. The admitted portion of the case as per the counter would give a fair idea about the facts of the case....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2012

G. Jayakumar, Senior Clerk Vs. the Chief Personnel Officer, Southern R ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Aug-17-2012

Subject : Education

Dr. K.B.S. Rajan, Judicial Member 1. The applicant joined the Railways as Senior Clerk on 15th June 1990 at the Headquarters Office at Madras. As he belongs to Kerala, he had made a request for Inter-Divisional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2003

Commander, S.P. Dutt Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, M ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)6; 104(2003)DLT49; 2003(3)SLJ453(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Jyoti Singh, Adv.

Vijender Jain, J. 1. Rule D.B.2. Mr. K. B. S. Rajan counsel for the petitioner has contended that after the recommendation of the Fourth Central Pay Commission, the petitioner has been denied the fixation of pay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2011

S. Chandran Vs. Union of India Represented by the General Manager and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Oct-20-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

DR. K.B.S. RAJAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. At the time of final hearing, counsel for the applicant submitted that major part of the grievance being ventilated through this OA has been redressed in that the applicant could...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial