Advanced Search Results

Bansilal Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 288 and 342; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR1971SC1116; 1971CriLJ828; (1971)3SCC203; 1971(III)LC352(SC); 1971(4)WLN33

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Mehta, Adv.

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal by the accused, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order of the Rajasthan High Court dated August 7, 1968 in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 394 of 1964.2. The...

Present: Ms.Abhilasha Kohli Advocate Vs. Shashi Aggarwal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

CR No.2886 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2886 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:9. 12.2011 Raman Kohli & Anr...Petitioners versus Shashi Aggarwal & Anr...Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present:...

Krishi Upaj Vyavasai Mandal and ors. Vs. the State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 245 and 246; Madhya Bharat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1952; Madhya Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Ordinance, 1962

Reported in : AIR1965MP6

Advocate for Respondent : M. Adhikari, Adv. General for No. 1 and ;K.B. Mehta, Adv. for No. 2

ORDER1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution mainly calls in question the validity of the Madhya, Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) ordinance, 1962 (2 of 1962) and the Madhya Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation)...

Nirmal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 51, 107 and 342

Reported in : AIR1972SC945; 1972CriLJ580; (1972)3SCC781; 1972(4)LC741(SC); 1972()WLN147

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Mehta, Adv.

P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. The appellant was convicted under Sections 302 and 307, IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years respectively. These sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The...

Madan Raj Bhandari Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 109 and 314; Evidence Act - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : AIR1970SC436; 1970CriLJ519; (1969)2SCC385; [1970]1SCR688; 1969()WLN37

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Mehta, Adv.

K.S. Hegde, J.1. The appellant's conviction by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jodhpur under Section 314 read with Section 109, Indian Penal Code, having been affirmed by the High Court of Rajasthan, he appeals to this...

Gopal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1972SC1838; 1972CriLJ1191; (1972)3SCC486; 1972(4)LC721(SC); 1972()WLN131

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Mehta, Adv.

1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court.2. Five persons were tried by the Sessions Judge, Ganganagar, on charges under Sections 147, 449, 307 and 302 read with...

Som Nath Puri Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1972SC1490; 1972CriLJ897; (1972)1SCC630; [1972]3SCR497; 1972()WLN125

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Mehta, Adv.

P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court. The accused was initially charged on three counts, firstly, under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(c) of...

K.B. Mehta Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)86ITD256(Pune.)

1. Since common issues are involved in these three appeals, two by the assessee and one by the Revenue, the same are consolidated and disposed of by a single order for the sake of convenience.2. In...

Hamabai J.K. Mehta Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1948)50BOMLR318

M.C. Chagla, C.J.1. The assessee Mr. Jehangir K.B. Mehta is a beneficiary under a certain trust dated April 8, 1924, executed by his wife Bai Hamabai J.K. Mehta, and one of the benefits that the assessee...

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. D.V. Save

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(11), 2(32), 3, 13, 14, 15, 52, 52(1) and 61(1)

Reported in : [1975]36STC47(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Mehta and ;V.H. Patil, Advs.

Madon, J.1. This is a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax. The statement of the case shows that the respondents carry...