Advanced Search Results

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 - Sections 78; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Parliament Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308; Evidence Act - Sections 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 215

Reported in : 2009CriLJ677; 151(2008)DLT695; 2008(105)DRJ557

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The question for our consideration is whether Mr. R.K. Anand and Mr. I.U. Khan, Senior Advocates and Mr. Sri Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate have committed criminal contempt of Court or not. We have...

Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. Jai Prakash Hyundai Corsortium

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationBanking

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi239; 2006(1)ARBLR587(Delhi); IV(2006)BC21; 2006(1)CTLJ87(Del); 129(2006)DLT453; 2006(88)DRJ332

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Anand, Sr. Adv. and ; Lovkesh Sawhney, Adv.

Vijender Jain, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by Satluj Jal Vitran Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'SJVN') impugning the order of the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Single Judge restrained the appellant...

Suhaib Ilyasi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 201, 304-B, 437 and 498-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4766; II(2000)DMC340

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.K. Anand, Sr. Advocate, ; Mr. K.C. Mittal and ; Mr.Pa

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 26.4.2000 by which the petitioner, Suhaib Ilyasi's bail application was rejected, on the ground that the case is still...

Educomp Solutions Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Advocate for Respondent : H. Roy, S.K. Medhi, K.L. Gupta, R.K. Anand, A.K. Bhattacharyya, P. Banerjee, B.K. Singh, A.K. Chavonous and S. Dutta, Advs.

B.S. Reddy, C.J.FACTUAL MATRIX:1. The Assam. Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. (AMTRON) had issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 23.11.2005 inviting bids for execution of the contractual work in the 4th Phase of Rajiv Gandhi Computer...

Mohd. Akram Ansari Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 81, 100 and 101; Government of National Capital Territory Act, 1991 - Sections 15; Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959; Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 14, 31 and 31A; Delhi Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2006; Rajasthan Legislative Assembly Members (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1969; Constitution of India - Articles 102(1) and 191

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT135

Advocate for Respondent : Iram Majid, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and 3, ; R.K. Anand, Sr. Adv. and ;

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This Petition has been filed under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 ('RP Act' for brevity) assailing the election to the Legislative Assembly of Delhi of Respondent No. 4,...

Sanjay JaIn and Another Vs. Bar Council of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 5; Bar Council of Delhi Rules, 1963 - Rules 36, 36A, 36(C), 36(D), 37, 37A, 44, 46, 47A, 48, 49, 52, 126, 127 and 129; Constitution of India - Article 226; Telegraph Act, 1885; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)345; AIR1998Delhi111; 1998(46)DRJ656

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.K. Anand, Sr. Adv. and ; Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv.

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. This is a writ petition challenging -(1) the removal of the first petitioner as the Honorary Secretary of the Bar Council of Delhi and installation of Shri Surya Prakash Khatri in his...

Colgate Palmolive Company and anr. Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care P ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 39, Rule 1; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Copyright Act, 1957; High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rules 147 and 148; Trade Mark Act, 1995 - Sections 46(1), 47, 48, 48(1), 48(2) and 49

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)228; 108(2003)DLT51; 2003(27)PTC478(Del); 2004(1)RAJ214

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Anand, Sr. Adv. and ; Amarjit Singh, Adv.

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. Through this application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC the plaintiff seeks ad interim injunction against the use of trade dress and colour combination of one third red and two third...

Ravi Khanna Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 9, 11-A and 14

Reported in : ILR1991Delhi483

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Anand, ; Ashok Bhasin, ; Harish Patni, ;

ORDERM. L. Varma, J.1. The respondent DDA has sanctioned construction of 'New Friends Club' on a plot of land between the Community Centre Friends Colony, New Delhi and 'C' Block of the said colony. The petitioners...

Mohammed Farooq Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1986(2)Crimes571; 29(1986)DLT468; 1986(11)DRJ44; 1989(39)ELT192(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. K. Anand

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by one Shri Mohd. Farooq, son of the detenu - Smt. Jaithoon Beevi, challenging the validity of the detention order...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Jayalakshmi Devarajan

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 110; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A; Gold Control (Forms, etc.) Rules - Rule 16(3)

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(Ker)236; [2006]286ITR412(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Anand and; Latha Krishnan, Advs.

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Trivandrum, aggrieved by the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in I. T. A. No. 79/Coch./96 dated April 28, 2000. Though four questions...