Advanced Search Results
M. Venkateswarlu and ors. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-12-1996
Service
Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 22, 33 and 47; Andhra Pradesh Revenue Subordinate Service Rules, 1961 - Rules 6 and 8; Constitution of India - Article 16(1), 16(4) and 16(4A)
1996IIIAD(SC)313; [1996(73)FLR986]; JT1996(3)SC439; 1996(3)SCALE44; (1996)5SCC167; [1996]3SCR266
P.P. Rao, ; K. Amareshwari, Senior Advs., ; C.K. Sucharita
K. Ramaswamy, J. 1. Leave granted. C.A. No. 4415/96 (@SLP (C) No. 13653/94)2. Appellant was appointed as L.D.C. on January 21, 1975 in the Revenue establishment of Prakasam District in A.P. He was promoted as a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNamburi Basava Subrahmanyam Vs. Alapati Hymavathi and Others
Supreme Court of India
Apr-02-1996
FamilyProperty
1996IVAD(SC)572; AIR1996SC2220; JT1996(5)SC330; 1996(4)SCALE278; (1996)9SCC388; [1996]3SCR1100
K. Amareshwari and ; G. Narasimhulu, Advs.
1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the counsel on both sides. This appeal by special leave arises from the Judgment and order dated July 11, 1995 of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Aswal Vs. Uoi and ors.
Delhi
Jan-11-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No. 578/2010 % Judgment reserved on:05. 11.2012 Judgment delivered on:11.01.2013 ASHOK KUMAR ASWAL Through: ..Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Parekh, Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Mr. Shivanath...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mir Mohammad Khasim Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-26-2004
Service
Andhra Pradesh Police Service Rules, 1966 - Rules 6 and 7; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 26 and 47
2004(5)ALT47(SC); [2004(101)FLR681]; [2004(4)JCR20(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC38; 2004(4)SCALE91; (2004)10SCC721; 2004(2)SLJ387(SC)
ORDER:'Shri Mohd.Khasim, Asst.Commandant (DSP-Category-3) was appointed by transfer as Deputy Superintendent of Police, Category-2 in the G.O.1st read above and commenced probation with effect from 1-3-1982. His probation was terminated and he was reverted as Asst.Commandant,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Tulsi Das and ors. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-24-2002
Service
Andhra Pradesh Educational Service Untrained Teachers (Regulation of Service and Fixation of Pay) Act, 1991 - Sections 2 and 3; Andhra Pradesh Educational Rules, 1966; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 309, 311 and 371D; Gujarat Panchayats (Third Amendment) Act, 1978; Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules
AIR2003SC43; JT2002(8)SC560; (2003)1SCC364; [2002]SUPP3SCR306; 2003(1)SLJ164(SC)
1. Leave granted in special leave petition (C)Nos. 3699-3710, 7808 and 21533-21580 of 1995.2. The above appeals have been filed against the commonorder of the Larger Bench of the Andhra PradeshAdministrative Tribunal at Hyderabad dated 27th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Talkies and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-2002
Other Taxes
Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 1988; Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 4; Municipalities Act; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 389A
AIR2003SC174; JT2002(9)SC284; (2003)1SCC40
Santosh Hegde, J.1. Having failed in their endeavour to question successfully the validity of the Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 1988 inserting Explanation-II in Section 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Andhra Pradesh Vs. T. Venkateswara Rao
Supreme Court of India
Feb-04-2004
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
AIR2004SC1728; 2004CriLJ1412; 2004(1)JKJ29[SC]; JT2004(2)SC154; 2004(2)SCALE227
D.V. Padma Priya, Adv.
N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. State of Andhra Pradesh is in appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad made in Criminal Appeal No. 491 of 1989 whereby the High Court set...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintending Engineer and ors. Vs. B. Subba Reddy
Supreme Court of India
Apr-26-1999
Arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96, 100, 104, 377, 379 and 381 - Orders 39, 41 - Rules 3, 4 and 22; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 39, and 41; Interest Act, 1978; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Schedule 1 - Article 3; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(3); Bengal Money Lenders Act, Sections 38(3)
AIR1999SC1747; 1999(2)ARBLR304(SC); 1999(2)CTC507; JT1999(3)SC311; 1999(2)MPLJ187; (1999)122PLR585; 1999(3)SCALE55; (1999)4SCC423; [1999]2SCR880; 1999(2)LC881(SC)
D. Bharathi, ; Reddy, Adv.
ORDERD.P. Wadhwa, J.1. This appeal is against the judgment dated December 23, 1992 of a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in proceedings arising out of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short, the 'Act')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManda Jaganath Vs. K.S. Rathnam and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-2004
Election
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 324 and 329; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 15, 30, 36, 81, 100 and 100(1); Representation of the People Rules; Representation of the People Orders; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rule 4; Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
AIR2004SC3600; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)527; 2004(5)ALT28(SC); JT2004(5)SC8; 2004(4)SCALE600; (2004)7SCC492
Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; R. Santhana Krishnan, ; G. Sateesh
N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. The first respondent herein filed his nomination to contest elections to the Parliament from 28 Nagarkurnool (SC) Constituency. On 2.4.2004 when the said nomination...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.B.i. Anti-corruption Branch, Mumbai Vs. Narayan Diwakar
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1999
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226(2)
AIR1999SC2362; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)872; 1999(3)ALLMR(SC)229; 1999CriLJ3666; JT1999(3)SC635; 1999(3)SCALE517; (1999)4SCC656; 1999(2)LC974(SC)
Mohapatra, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The main question that arises for consideration in this case is whether, on the facts and in circumstances of the case, the Gauhati High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »