Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k alagirisami · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 2012

T.S.T.Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Regional Transport Authority

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-2012

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 48(3)(21), 214(2), 217-A, 81, 2, 87, 72; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.K.Alagirisamy, Adv.

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order of the 2nd respondent dated 04.02.2004 passed in Appeal No.1052...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1999

M.P.M. Hameed Ibrahim and One Another Vs. V.S. Bagirathan and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 2(8), 10(2), (3) and 25

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC396

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K. Alagirisamy, ;Senior Adv. for Mr. G. Kathirevel Adv.

ORDER1. The first respondent in this revision is the landlord/petitioner in R.C.O.P.No.704 of 1990 on the file of the Rent Controller (14th Small Causes Court) Madras. The second respondent in this revision is the first respondent/tenant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2004

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Regional Manager and Sen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-23-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 - Rules 4(4) and 23; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : (2005)1MLJ72

Advocate for Respondent : K. Alagirisamy, Sr. Counsel for ;P. Gopirajan, Adv. for Respondent 1

D. Murugesan, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 22.09.2004. The brief facts regarding the present controversy are summarized as under:2. The appellant is the New India Assurance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 2007

Mangaiyarkarasi Aided Middle School Rep. by Its Manager and Correspond ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Elementary Education Rules, 1920 - Rule 4; Tamil Nadu Elementary Education Act - Sections 8(3); Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ188

Advocate for Respondent : V. Vivekanandan, Addl. Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and ;K. Alagirisamy, Sr. Counsel for R. Balasubramanian, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the Manager and Correspondent of an aided Middle School seeking a mandamus to forbear the respondents 1 to 4 from allowing the 5th respondent to run...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2004

Trichy Engineering College, Rep. by Dr. M. Sekar, Public Relations Off ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-06-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Administrative Law; Anna University Act, 1978 - Sections 5, 29 and 38A(3) to 38A(6); Constitution of India

Reported in : 2004(5)CTC572

Advocate for Respondent : G. Masilamani, Senior Counsel for ;G.M. Mani Associates for Anna University, ;Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel for A.I.C.T.E. and ;Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader for Government

ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. In all these writ appeals, the interim orders passed by the learned single judge in the respective writ petitions are questioned. The basic issue which requires to be examined in the main writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2003

Minor Cibiraj Rep. by His Mother M. Jayanthi and M. Jayanthi Vs. C. Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 43, Rules 1, 1A, 5 and 7

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ515

Advocate for Respondent : Alagirisamy, S.C. for ;A.K. Kumarasamy for R. 2

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. C.M.A.No.771 of 2003 has been preferred under Order XLIII Rule 1 (na) CPC challenging the fair and decretal order dated 11.9.2003 passed in Pauper O.P.NO:(Unnumbered) of 2003 in O.S.No.312 of 1995 on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2012

Sri Nithyananda Swami Vs. S. Arathi Rao and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-10-2012

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2012(6)CTC74; 2012(7)MLJ796

(Prayer: This Original application is filed under Order XIV Rule VIII read with Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC seeking for an ad interim injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents, servants, representatives or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2008

A. Srinivasan and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-23-2008

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 15, 18, 23, 23(2), 28, 30, 30(1) and 34; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rule 8(1), 8A, 8C, 8(2), 8(3), 8(4), 8(5), 8(6), 8(7) and 8(8); Mineral Concession Rules, 1949; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 23(1A)

Reported in : AIR2008Mad211

Advocate for Respondent : R. Thirugnanam, Special Government Pleader assisted by ;P. Subramanian, Govt. Adv.

D. Murugesan, J.1. The issues raised for consideration in the writ appeals and writ petitions are common and hence they are taken up together for disposal by this common order.2. The points projected in the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2005

Viswapriya Financial Services and Securities Limited Rep. by Its Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ;Reserve Bank of India Act in 1997 - 45IA, 45N (2), 45-IA (1), 45-IA (6) and 45-IA (7); ;Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas670(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsel for ;T. Poornam and ;P. Neelakantan, Advs.

ORDERD.Murugesan, J.1. The petitioner company was incorporated on 13.5.91 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. As the petitioner company is a Non Banking Financial Company, in terms of the amendment to the Reserve Bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2001

S.V.S. Oil Mills Vs. S.V.S. Agro Refineries P. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-27-2001

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2002(24)PTC41(Mad)

A. Kulasekaran, J. 1. This application for interim injunction in O.A. No. 505 of 2001 in C.S. No. 435 of 2001 is filed to restrain the respondents from manufacturing, marketing, advertising in all media including electronic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial