Advanced Search Results

Parmali Wallace Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 36 and 41; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 41

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)335; 75(1998)DLT413; 1999(49)DRJ41

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Adv.

S.N. Kapoor, J.1. By this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called the 'Act' for short), the petitioner company seeks (i) declaration that the respondent Railways cannot withhold, adjust and/or...

Mr. Sarabjit Singh Sahi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 16; Navy Service Pension and Gratuity Pension Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 78, 217 and 218; Contact Act - Sections 19

Reported in : 2002(62)DRJ800

Advocate for Respondent : Jyoti Singh, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. In these Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution it has been prayed that a writ of Mandamus be issued directing the Respondents to release the Petitioner immediately, with full terminal benefits including...

Const. Hans Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Sections 87, 74, 99, 117, 117(2), 139 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 148, 149 , 167 to 169; ;Army Act, 1958 - Sections 116; ;Army Rules - Rules 62, 103 to 133 and 133-161; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 378(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 33, 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(87)DRJ108

Advocate for Respondent : P.P. Malhotra, Addl. Solicitor General, ; Manoj Ohri and ;

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the leading writ petitions No. 9427/05 and 4753/02 are taken up for final hearing as all these writ petitions raise a common question...

Lama Transport Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 47, Rule 1; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(2)ARBLR218(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT874; 2002(64)DRJ350

Advocate for Respondent : Sujata Kashyap, Adv.

B.N. Chaturvedi, J. 1. Against an award dated 19.7.1988, the applicant/respondent, Union of India, filed its objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, which came up for hearing on 7th of April,...

Pioneer Publicity Corporation Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)469; 2003(1)ARBLR672(Delhi); 103(2003)DLT442; 2003(2)RAJ132; [2004]50SCL331(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Jyoti Singh, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying that Respondent No. 1, Delhi Transport Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the DTC) be restrained from taking...

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Ms. Tina Singh

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)No.6563/2011 Reserved on :12. h August, 2013 Date of decision :23. d September, 2013 % AVTAR SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. D.J.Singh, Adv....

Ravinder Chauhan Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Ms. Aditi Gupta

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 07.2014 Pronounced on:23. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 3663/2011, C.M. NO.13423/2011 & 14215/2013 RAVINDER CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Ms....

indu Singh Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Respondent : Ms.Jyoti Singh; Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advs.

1. In the year 2009 the petitioner was working as a Head Constable (Radio Operator) with Central Reserve Police Force (herein after referred to as the "CRPF") and was attached with 1st Signal Battalion. 2. On...

Dr. (Mrs.) Vidyut Shikha Vs. Union Public Service Commission

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Ms. Jyoti Singh, Shri. Ankur Chhibber

1. In this OA the applicant has challenged the short-listing criteria adopted by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC, for short) (respondent No. 1) for inviting General Female Category (GFC, for short) applicants for interview for the...

Amar Nath Sehgal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 52(1), 57 and 57(1)

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT717; 2005(30)PTC253(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Jyoti Singh, Adv.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Copyright is one of the three main branches of the traditional law of intellectual property, along with patent law and trade mark law. Overshadowed historically by the economic worth of patents and trade...