Advanced Search Results

William Rebello Vs. Jose Agnelo Vaz and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 - Sections 4; Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Family Laws) - Schedule - Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 37 and 38; Goa, Daman and Diu, 1963 - Regulation 11; Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 60; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 6 and 12; Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 18; Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 3; Special Marriage Act, 1954; Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1939 - Schedule - Articles 75 and 535; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1996Bom204; II(1996)DMC339

Advocate for Respondent : Joseph Vaz, Adv.

1. This Appeal raises an important question of law with regard to the application of the provisions of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929, and the point raised is of public importance.2. The provisions of the...

Sunil Gudlar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Bran ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

Oral Order: Heard Shri Teles, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Shri Vaz, learned Special Public Prosecutor, and Shri J. P. D' Souza, learned Counsel, appearing for the Respondents. Shri J. P. D' Souza, learned...

Sunil Gudlar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Bran ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

Oral Order: Heard Shri Teles, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Shri Vaz, learned Special Public Prosecutor, and Shri J. P. D' Souza, learned Counsel, appearing for the Respondents. Shri J. P. D' Souza, learned...

Parameshwaran Subramani and Another Vs. State, Through Central Bureau ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally by consent. 2. By this application, the applicants have challenged the correctness and legality of the order dated 06.08.2015 passed by the Special Judge, Panaji in Special Case No. 1/2013 thereby...

Parameshwaran Subramani and Another Vs. State, Through Central Bureau ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally by consent. 2. By this application, the applicants have challenged the correctness and legality of the order dated 06.08.2015 passed by the Special Judge, Panaji in Special Case No. 1/2013 thereby...

Mayfair Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, Represented by its Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R. G. Ramani, Mr. R. G. Ramani

1. This Writ Petition challenges the legality and correctness of the judgment and order dated 03/07/2006, passed by the President, Co-operative Tribunal, Goa at Panaji in Cooperative Appeal No.14/2003, thereby dismissing the appeal and upholding the...

Mayfair Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, Represented by its Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R. G. Ramani, Mr. R. G. Ramani

1. This Writ Petition challenges the legality and correctness of the judgment and order dated 03/07/2006, passed by the President, Co-operative Tribunal, Goa at Panaji in Cooperative Appeal No.14/2003, thereby dismissing the appeal and upholding the...

Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and Others versus Government of Karnataka a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.190

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 190 : 2025 INSC 3 Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and Others v. Government of Karnataka and Others (Civil Appeal No. 17 of 2025) 02 January 2025 [B.R. Gavai* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.] Issue...

Cosme Remedies Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR156; 2008(229)ELT213(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Joseph Vaz, Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4

Parkar S.S., J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Shri Vaz appearing for the Respondents waives service. By consent Petitions are heard finally.2. All these petitions seek to challenge the common Order dated 10.2.2005 passed by...

Smt. Ninette Proenca Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu School Education Rules, 1986 - Rules 75, 78 and 81(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR336

Advocate for Respondent : G.U. Bhobe, Government Adv. for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;M.B. D'Costa, Adv. for the respondent No. 3 and ;Joseph Vaz, Adv. for the respondent No. 4

T.K. Chandra Shekhara Das, J.1. When the controversy involved in this petition arose, the petitioner was working as a Teacher in the primary section in the third respondent school, St. Joseph's High School, Calangute. She is...