Advanced Search Results

The State Vs. Golam Rasul

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 492 and 492(1); ;Calcutta High Court (Extension of Jurisdiction) Act, 1953; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 -Section 2(7); ;Constitution of India - Article 258(1)

Reported in : AIR1970Cal162

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Sinha and ;I.A. Qayum, Advs.

Amaresh Roy, J.1. This appeal fa from Andaman and Nicobar Islands and has been preferred by the State through the Public Prosecutor, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, against an order of acquittal passed by the Additional District...

Kartick Das Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

N.C. Talukdar, J.1. This Rule is against an order dated the 11th August. 1971 passed by Sri. K. Naskar. Magistrate. 1st Class. Alipore. District 24 Parsanas in case No. G. R. Case No. 701 of 1970...

Pravudayal Agarwala Vs. Ramkumar Agarwala

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 21; ;Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 88, 89 and 90; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR1956Cal41

Advocate for Respondent : Naresh Chandra Sen Gupta and ;Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Advs.

R.P. Mookerje, J. 1. The plaintiff respondent filed the suit out of which this appeal arises praying for specific performance of a contract, in the alternative for declaration of title in respect of certain lands--the plaintiff...

Shashi Bhusan Maity and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405 and 406; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 523 and 550

Reported in : AIR1957Cal148,1957CriLJ367

Advocate for Respondent : Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Adv.

ORDERDebabrata Mookerjee, J. 1. These five petitioners have been convicted of an offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and each sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 80/- in default to suffer rigorous...

The Commissioner of Wakfs Vs. Sm. Ayesa Bibi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bengal Wakf Act, 1934 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 71

Reported in : AIR1966Cal68

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Chakravarty and ;Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Advs.

ORDERP.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure on behalf of the Commissioner of Wakf, West Bengal. It raises an interesting question.2. A brief account of the facts...

M.L. Das and Sons Vs. Sampatmull Bothra

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 23; ;West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Section 9(1)

Reported in : AIR1954Cal103,57CWN894

Advocate for Respondent : Sen Gupta and ;Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Advs.

ORDER1. This Rule arises out of a proceeding for standardisation of rent started by the tenant petitioner. The proceeding has had a long and chequered career and the circumstances under which the matter has now come...

Nelson Loo Vs. M.L. Gupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405 and 409

Reported in : AIR1962Cal197

Advocate for Respondent : Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Adv.

Debabrata Mookerjee, J. 1. The appellant Nelson Loo has been convicted by a Presidency Magistrate on three counts of charge under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to varying terms of imprisonment and...

Sk. AlimuddIn and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 307

Reported in : AIR1962Cal251

Advocate for Respondent : Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Adv.

P.B. Mukharji. J.1. This is a Jury Reference by the Assistant Sessions Judge of 24 Parganas. There were five accused (1) Sk. Alimuddin, (2) Sk. Rustam, (3) Abdul Rashid, (4) Pato Bibi and (5) (sic) Bibi....

Mrityunjoy Chatterjee and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 144, 353, 537 and 540A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 188

Reported in : AIR1955Cal439,1955CriLJ1171,59CWN470

Advocate for Respondent : Jogesh Chandra Sinha, Adv.

ORDERP.N. Mookerjee, J.1. This Rule and the connected Reference case arise out of the same criminal proceeding started against five accused persons, three of whom figure in the Rule, and one in the Reference case, the...