Advanced Search Results

Pramod Chandra Pant Vs. Chief Engineer, U.P. Power Corporation Limited ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC376

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Atul Dayal, counsel for landlord/petitioner and Sri H.P. Dube and Sri R.C. Singh, counsels for tenant/respondents.2. Petitioner is owner and landlord of premises No. 359, Bara Bazar. Thakurdwara, Moradabad, which consists...

Rohit Verma Vs. Sheikh Sultan and Another

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 405, 406, 420, 422, 423, 441, 442 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202 and 482

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT37(CG)

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. This order shall dispose of M.Cr.C. Nos. 6918/99, 6469/99 and 4891/99, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of the proceedings.2. Along with the petition a copy of the complaint, certain agreements...

Shrikishan Vs. Bhanwarlal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 114

Reported in : AIR1974Raj96; 1973()WLN778

Advocate for Respondent : D.S. Shisodiya, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2,; Jitendra Kumar Singhvi, Adv. for minor Respondent

C.M. Lodha, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal arising out of a money suit based on a promissory note marked Ex. 1 on the record. 2. The plain tiff-appellant Shri-kishan's case as set out...

Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. Chairman Railway Board and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act 1948 - Section 46

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDER1. Eighteen Petitioners employed...

NitIn Sinha Vs. Union of India Through: Its Secretary, Ministry of Per ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Education

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. (1) Petitioner- Nitin Sinha is a Bardana (gunny bag) Trader. He has filed this petition, styled as Public Interest Litigation (PIL), for issuance of a writ of quo warranto to quash the...

Medley Minerals India Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Orissa Minor Mineral Concessions Rules, 1990 - Rules 6, 6(3), 9, 9(2), 9(3), 12 and 31

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR18(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC29; 2004(8)SCALE25; (2004)12SCC390

Advocate for Respondent : Jana Kalyan Das, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1-3, ; Y. Prabakar Rao, ;

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. The appellant calls in question the judgment and order dated 1.8.2003 of the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court, by which a quarry lease granted in favour of the appellant was quashed...

Biren Datta and ors. Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. The six petitioners (1. Shri Biren Dutta, 2. Shri Benu Sen, 3. Shri Dinesh Deb Barma, 4. Bhanu Ghosh. 5. Jogabrala Sen Gupta and 6. Shri Deba Brata Chakraborty). who are the...

Biren Datta and ors. Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Rajvi Roop Singh, J.C.1. The 12 petitioners (1. Shri Biren Datta, 2 Shri Prabhat Deb Barma, 3. Shri Benoy Deb Barma, 4. Shri Pulin Deb Barma, 5, Shri Nagendra Deb Barma, 6. Shri Arjun Deb Barma,...

Shyama Charan Dubey Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 82, 83, 84, 154, 157, 161, 164, 165, 166, 167, 169, 170, 172, 173, 173(2), 173(8), 190, 190(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 323 and 396

Reported in : 1990CriLJ456

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

ORDERPalok Basu, J.1. The short question involved in the present application under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is as to whether on the facts of the present case the accused possesses a right to get further investigations...

Upendra Nath Das and anr. Vs. Chintamoni Devi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 4 and 23; ;Hindu Women's Right to Property Act,

Reported in : AIR1963Cal22

Advocate for Respondent : Jitendra Kumar Sen Gupta and ;Rabi Ranjan Das Gupta, Advs.

Amaresh Roy, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a suit for partition instituted by the present respondent No. 1, Ghinta-moni Devi, in which a preliminary decree has been passed by the learned Subordinate Judge. The...