Advanced Search Results

Pramod Chandra Pant Vs. Chief Engineer, U.P. Power Corporation Limited ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC376

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Atul Dayal, counsel for landlord/petitioner and Sri H.P. Dube and Sri R.C. Singh, counsels for tenant/respondents.2. Petitioner is owner and landlord of premises No. 359, Bara Bazar. Thakurdwara, Moradabad, which consists...

Rohit Verma Vs. Sheikh Sultan and Another

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 405, 406, 420, 422, 423, 441, 442 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202 and 482

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT37(CG)

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. This order shall dispose of M.Cr.C. Nos. 6918/99, 6469/99 and 4891/99, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of the proceedings.2. Along with the petition a copy of the complaint, certain agreements...

State vs Mohd Shamsher

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Ms. Shivpriya, Ms. Harshita Singh, Ms. Anjali Kumari

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision:17th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 20th March, 2026. + CRL.A. 1434/2012 STATE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP with Insp. Naveen Rathi & SI Manisha,...

Vinod Kumar Bansal vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mr.Rahul Mehra, Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr. Srivasts Kaushal, Mr. Arjun Pant, Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, Mr. Anil Grover, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Ms. Noopur Singhal, Mr. Rishi Vohra, Ms. Aditi Gupta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~Spl.DB-2 * + WP(C) No.1977/2014 VINOD KUMAR BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mr. Khagesh B.Jha, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through:...

Terumo Penpol Private Limited vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Alok Ranjan

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1922/2019 & CM Nos. 8947-8948/2019 TERUMO PENPOL PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr Samudra Sarangi, Ms Shruti...

Nitin Kumar Vs. Staff Selection Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Suyash Kumar, Mr. J.P. Shukla

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:09. 07.2015 + W.P. (C) 2888/2015 CM APPL.5180/2015, 6028/2015 NITIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Sharma with Ms. Boudh Prabha, Advocates. versus...

Vision Steel Limited and Ors vs State Bank of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Kumar

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 476/2026 & CM APPL. 2336/2026 VISION STEEL LIMITED AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Counsel (appearance not given)versusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:...

Shailendra Kumar vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Sumit Kumar Raj

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19414/2025 SHAILENDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Choudhary, Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Mukul Singh, Mr. Himanshu Verma, Advs.versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents Through:...

Sarvan Kumar vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Soumit Ganguli

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19501/2025 SARVAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Choudhary, Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Mukul Singh, Mr. Himanshu Verma, Advs.versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr....

Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. Chairman Railway Board and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act 1948 - Section 46

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDER1. Eighteen Petitioners employed...