Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: jayanta mitter · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.035 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2004

Ridh Karan Rekecha and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Artcle 226; ;National Highway Act, 1956 - Sections 3A, 3A(1), 3A(2), 3C, 3C(1), 3D, 3D(1), 3E, 3E(2), 3G, 3G(4), 3F, 3H and 3H(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : 2004(4)CHN327

Advocate for Respondent : Jayanta Mitter and ;Amitabha Ghose, Advs. for respondent No. 5, ;P.K. Roy, ;Basudev Mukherjee and ;A.P. Singh, Advs. for respondent Nos. 4 and 6 and ;Subir Pal, Adv.;Sridhar Panja, Adv.

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 20th of June, 2003 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No. 1521KW) of 2001. In connection with the said appeal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1979

Amal Kumar Mukherjee and anr. Vs. Clarian Advertising Service Ltd. and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-03-1979

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 295, 397 and 398

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas315(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Sankar Ghosh, ;P.C. Sen and ;Jayanta Mitter, Advs. (Neutral)

Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an interlocutory application in a main petition tinder Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, presented on the 27th of July, 1979. Ad interim orders were issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1981

Darjeeling Commercial Co. Ltd. Vs. Pandam Tea Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-15-1981

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 439 and 443; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 17, 69 and 95; ;Indian Limitiation Act, 1908 - Section 19; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 18

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas814(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Mukherjee and ;R.N. Ghosh, Advs.

Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application for the winding up of the company under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. This petition has a chequered career as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 1984

Ashoke Kumar Daw and anr. Vs. Gobinda Chandra Dev and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-02-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 99 - Order 3, Rule 2; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 202

Reported in : AIR1984Cal337

Advocate for Respondent : Javanta Mitra, Adv. (for Nos. 1-16 and 18-21), ;Som Nath Chatterjee, Adv. (for No. 17)

M.N. Roy, J.1. The Respondents in this proceeding, are the members of Mohan Bagan Athletic Club and the office-bearers of the same. They convened a Special General Meeting of the club. for amending the Rules for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 1982

Bengal Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Barhan Gope

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-31-1982

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1983)IILLJ86Cal

Sambhu Chandra Ghose, C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Tribunal. The claimant resnon dent was a workman employed by a contractor with the appellant alleged to have received personal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1981

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Ramjidas Shriram and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-07-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2, 11, 20 and 47 - Order 37, Rule 2; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1982Cal34

ORDER1. This is an application in execution of part of a decree transmitted for Rs. 30 lacs for execution against the judgment-debtors Nos. 1 to 6. Execution is sought against the judgment debtor Nos. 1 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1974

Seimens India Ltd. Vs. Phanindra Kumar Dutt

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-27-1974

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 34

Reported in : AIR1975Cal271

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. De, Adv.

ORDERHazra, J.1. This is an application for stay of a suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The matter arises in thisway :2. On or about March 7, 1974, one Phanindra Kumar Dutt filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1991

State Bank of India Staff Association and Others Vs. Monindra Bhattach ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-24-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Section 9;; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Section 19;; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 2;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order I, Rules 8, 15 and 20

Reported in : AIR1991Cal378,(1991)2CALLT340(HC),96CWN350

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Mukherjee, ;S.N. Mukherjee, ;S.Pal, ;Miss N. Patheria,; Anindya Mitra, ;P.K. Chatterjee,; Mrs. Gita Gupta, ;Miss Samapti Chatterjee, ;Jayanta Mitra, ;Barin Ghosh and ;Sanji Bakshi, ;Gopal Chakra

ORDERA.M. Bhattacharjee, J.1. I have considered, and agree with, the judgment and order of brother Ray.Ajov Nath Ray, J.2. The appeal is directed against Justice Suhas Chandra Sen's Judgment and Order dated 7th May, 1991, which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1984

Sudhir Kumar Saha and ors. Vs. J.N. Chemicals Private Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-12-1984

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 2; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13 and 34

Reported in : AIR1985Cal454

Advocate for Respondent : Hirak Mitra, Adv.

ORDERC.K. Banerji, J.1. This is an application for stay of the suit being Suit No, 17 of 1983 instituted in this Court by J. N. Chemicals Private Ltd. thereinafter referred to as the Company) against Sudhir...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1981

Shib Nath Paul Vs. Jaharlal Paul and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-16-1981

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 44

Reported in : AIR1982Cal143

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Sen, Adv. (for No. 1) and ;Swapan Mallik, Adv. (for No. 2)

C.K. Banerji, J. 1. In this interlocutory application the appellant is asking, inter alia, for an injunction restraining the respondent No. 1, his servants, agents and assistants from parting with possession of the vacant portion of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial