Advanced Search Results

Asa Ram and Another Vs. M.C.D. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 33; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 63 and 114; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 1996ACJ20; 1994IVAD(Delhi)365; AIR1995Delhi164; 56(1994)DLT441

Advocate for Respondent : Jayant Nath, Adv.

ORDER1. Sh. Asa Ram and another, by this suit, against the M.C.D. and others, have sought recovery of Rs. 4 lacs as damages on account of the death of their son Karan Singh, which according to...

Amrendra Kumar Pandey Vs. Staff Selection Commission and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(63)DRJ674

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Jain, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. This wit petition is directed against a judgment and order dated 18th September 2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 1350/2001 whereby and whereunder Original Application filed by the...

R.K. Bhatia Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)413

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jayant Nath, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order of removal by the first respondent. The facts culminating in the writ petition could be narrated thus:Till 1989, the petitioner was working under the first respondent Board...

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. Vs Central Distille ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Punjab Excise Act

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Rule 17-B

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul ; Mr. Jayant Nath, ; Mrs. Anjali K. Verma ; Mr. Niraj Gupta, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? 1. These are six writ petitions...

Government of National Capitalterritory of Delhi Thorugh .Principal Se ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Punjab Excise Act

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Rule 17-B

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul ; Mr. Jayant Nath, ; Mrs. Anjali K. Verma ; Mr. Niraj Gupta, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes1. These are six writ petitions...

Victor Cable Industries Limited Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT740

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jayant Nath, Adv.

ORDERDr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. In relation to contract for supply of 90 kilometers of underground electric cables contained in Purchase Order dated 11.3.1992 issued by the respondents, the petitioner made supplies of entire goods. While effecting...

Vijay Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)994; 73(1998)DLT634; 1998(46)DRJ214

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jayant, Nath, Adv.

K. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The two petitioners have challenged the selection made by the MCD to 48 temporary posts of trained telephone operators. The case of the petitioners is: Respondents 3 to 15, who are not qualified,...

The Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and ors. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Hotel Proprietors Act, 1956; Constitution Forty-sixth Amendment Act, 1982; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 33, 39, 67 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1956; Sale of Goods Act; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 5, 6(2), 23, 23(2) and 23(4); Packaged Commodities Rules - Rule 39; Constitution of India - Article 366

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT7; 2007(94)DRJ573

Advocate for Respondent : Jayant Nath, Sr. Adv. and ; R.K. Jha, Adv. and ; Sandeep Gu

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The question that arises in these petitions is whether it is impermissible for the Petitioners to charge their customers/guests the any price above the maximum retail price (MRP) mentioned on mineral-water packaged and...

Rajinder Gopal and Others Vs. Gowarsons Publishers

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)203; 2000(53)DRJ156

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jayant Nath and ; Mr. M.L. Chawla, Advs.

ORDERVijender Jain, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Trial Court allowing amendments in the written statement, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners. 2. It has been contended by...

Jaswant Singh Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(Delhi)883; 72(1998)DLT686; 1998(45)DRJ464

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jayant Nath, Adv.

Dr. M. K. Sharma, J. 1. Challenge is made, in this writ petition by the petitioners, to the orders dated 22.4.1978 and 17.5.1978 whereby the respondents have promoted respondents No. 5 to 47 to the post...