Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: jayakumar s patil and · Page 1 of about 903 results (0.455 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 22 2008

Smt. Rekha D. Shetty W/O D.M. Shetty Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-22-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 4(2)(6), 5A, 6, 9, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4) and 17(A); Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ448:2009(4)KCCR2500:2009(3)AIRKarR438:AIR2009NOC1870(D.B

Advocate for Respondent : Niloufer Akbar, Additional Govt. Adv. for R. 1 and 2,; A.K. Vasanth,; K. Girish, Advs. for R. 3 and; Reuben Jacob, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.1. The unsuccessful writ petitioner-appellant has preferred the above appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dated 22.7.2008 passed in Writ petition No. 12556/2007 disposing of the writ petition, wherein the appellant-writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2005

The Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. V ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-05-2005

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 29C and 70; Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Rules, 1960 - Rule 14(15) and 14(22)

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2098; 2005(4)KarLJ439

Advocate for Respondent : M. Krishna Reddy, HCGP for R1 and ;Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv. (Sr. Counsel for R-3)

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. The petitioner seeks writ of certiorari to quash the endorsement dated 11.03.2005 vide Annexure-E, by which the petitioner's nomination paper is rejected by the Returning Officer, (the Respondent No. 1 herein) on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2006

H.G. Sheela Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-24-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(6), 3, 3(1), 4C, 13, 28(1), 28(4), 28(6) and 41(2); Companies Act, 1956; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3), 14A and 19; Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 19(4); Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2, 3, 38A, 38A(1) and 38(2); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 14, 16, 21 and 226; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Act - Sections 126(2); Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 1974 - Sections 126; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A, 17(1), 17(4) and 57; Cyprus Emergency Powers (Collective Punishment) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ24

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Hatti, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent 1, R.N. Narasimha Murthy, Senior Counsel for S.T. Mahesh, Adv. for Caveator Respondent 2 and 3, Jayakumar S. Patil, Senior Counsel for H.C. Kav

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. By consent of the learned Counsels for the parties these writ petitions were heard together and disposed of by this common order as the lands involved are same and common questions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 2004

Ashok Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Chickodi Sub Division and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-16-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Panchayatraj Act, 1993 - Sections 49; Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994 - Rule 3(8)

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4557; 2004(7)KarLJ524

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Narayana, HCGP for R1, ;Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Counsel for ;Iqbal Patel, Adv. for C/R2 and R3 and ;Riyaz Ahmed, Adv. for R4

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This Writ Petition raises a short but interesting question as to when can it be said that a 'No Confidence Motion' moved in terms of the provisions of Section 49 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2004

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Pooja Travels and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Subject : Motor VehiclesCommercial

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 28, 38, 65, 66(1), 68(2), 68(3), 68(5), 69, 72, 74, 80, 80(1), 80(2), 86(5), 88(2), 95, 96, 100(3), 109, 111, 138 and 178; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 55 and 56; ;

Reported in : ILR2005KAR164; 2005(1)KarLJ419

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Krishnaswamy, Adv. for Respondent-1 in W.P. No. 18672 of 2004, ;Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Counsel for ; B.R. Shailendra and ;S. Shivananjappa, Advs. Respondent-1 in W.P. Nos. 40338 to 40342 of 200

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. The petitioners in all these writ petitions i.e., Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation ('Corporation' for short) and two private operators are seeking writ of certiorari to quash the orders passed by the Secretaries...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2012

Smt. Narasamma and ors. Vs. K.V. Ramprasad and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-10-2012

Subject : CIvil

Acts : Karnataka Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Section 4(2); Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7 Rule 11(d), Order 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 54

Advocate for Respondent : Jayakumar S. Patil; M. Shivaprakash; H.T. Narendra Prasad, Advs.

(This Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 28.3.2012 in O.S.No.2375/2011, 2372/2011 2370/2011 and 2374/2011 on the file of the 7th Addl....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2004

Yellappa and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-03-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 243T and 245D; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 42(2A)

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3966; 2004(7)KarLJ449

Advocate for Respondent : Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Adv. for R5 and ;H.B. Narayan, HCGP for R1 to 3

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J. 1. Though the matter is listed for orders on I.As I and II, with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties it is taken for final disposal and disposed of as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1995

Mallikarjunagouda Vs. Principal Munsiff

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-12-1995

Subject : ElectionCivil

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 15 to 17 and 17(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 8(4) and 10 - Order 23, Rule 1A

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2595; 1995(4)KarLJ510

Advocate for Respondent : Nagarajappa, HCGP for R1 to R8 and Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv. for R3

ORDERRajendra Babu, J. 1. This Petition is directed against an order made by the Munsiff at Hubli in an Election Petition arising under Section 15 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 in relation to an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2001

Gulbarga University, Gulbarga Vs. Mallikarjun

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-30-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 16 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47

Reported in : 2002(2)KarLJ398

Advocate for Respondent : Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv.

ORDERM.P. Chinnappa, J.1. Heard Sri Udaya Holla, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jayakumar S. Patil for the respondent.2. The brief facts which are not in dispute are that the petitioner and the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1998

Nagamma and Others Vs. Deveeramma and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-26-1998

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 -Sections 14(1), 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1933 -Sections 4, 10 and 16; Mysore Act - Sections 12; Mysore General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 2, 3 and 5; Mysore General Clauses (Amendment) Act, 1953

Reported in : 2001(6)KarLJ373

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv.

1. This is defendants' second appeal from the judgment and decree dated 23-10-1990 passed by Sri R.H. Raddi, Principal Civil Judge and C.J.M., Shimoga in Regular Appeal No. 41/88 dismissing the defendants' appeal and confirming the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial