Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: jas sanghvi · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 21 2009

The Commissioner of Income Tax - 12 Vs. Ms. Mudera G. Nanawati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(Bom)387

Advocate for Respondent : Jitendra Jain and ;Jas Sanghvi, Advs., i/b., PDS Legal

1. Heard. Both parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. HUF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2008

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Shree Rubber Plast Co. Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2008

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G and 35G(9); Limitation Act 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130; Rent Act - Sections 13(4) and 18; Limitation Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Income Tax Act - Sections 260A

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR53; 2009(111)BomLR585; (2009)221CTR(Bom)652; 2009(234)ELT33(Bom); [2009]16STJ355; [2009]20STT9

Advocate for Respondent : Jas Sanghvi, Adv. i/b., PDS Legal in Notice of Motion Nos. 2869 and 2970/2008 in Cexal No. 143 and 144/2008 and Notice of Motion No. 3119/2008 in Cuappl No. 84/2008, ;Madhur Baya and ;Vikram Nankani,

S. Radhakrishnan J.1. All the above matters have been referred to us by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, in view of conflicting decisions of two Division Benches on the issue of whether this Court is empowered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial