Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: jai chinoy · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 26 1995

H.L. Roche and Others Vs. Citizen Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-26-1995

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 73B(2) and 77-BB; Constitution of India - Articles 43-A, 226 and 227; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 56A

Reported in : AIR1996Bom126; 1996(2)BomCR411; (1995)97BOMLR546; 1996(1)MhLj258

Advocate for Respondent : Jai Chinoy, ;Y.S. Jahagirdar, Advs., i/b. ;Gabriel Pillai and ;V.M. Parshurami, A.G.P.

ORDER1. Whether the Board of Directors of the respondent No. 1 Bank is properly constituted in accordance with the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the rules framed thereunder and the bye-laws of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

Mahendra Builders Vs. Parvez Ghaswala and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Bombay Rent Act; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144 - Sections 4 to 24

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR641; 2006(4)BomCR824; 2006(3)MhLj668

Advocate for Respondent : Naushad Engineer and ;S.T. Shaikh, Advs., i/b., S.K. Srivastav, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;Jai Chinoy and ;Sanjay Jain, Advs., i/b., Zohair and Co. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4

A.M. Khanwilkar, J. 1. Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. 2. In my order dated March 29, 2006, statement made on behalf of the petitioner has been recorded to the effect that the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2008

Oberoi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Worli Shivshahi Co-op. Hsg. Society ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-30-2008

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 7(3), 7(4), 9 and 11; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act

Reported in : 2008(4)ARBLR179(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Jai Chinoy, Sr. Adv. and ;Shailesh Shah and ;Prakash Ganwani, Advs., i/b., ;Shiralkar and Co.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. In Arbitration Petition No. 233 of 2007 the appellants herein had applied under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for reliefs as set out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial