Advanced Search Results

Khudo Mal Madan Mohan and ors. Vs. Dominion of India B.B. and C.i. Rly ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1963All276

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Seth, ;T.N. Sapru and ;T.R. Kesharwani, Advs.

Takru, J. 1. This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against an appellate order of the learned Civil Judge, Mathura dismissing his suit for the recovery of Rs. 1226/13/6 as damages from the Dominion, now the...

J.S. Gupta and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(101)ECC333

1. M/s. J.S. Gupta & Sons have filed the present appeal against the Memorandum No. 1 dated 27-7-04 by which the Commissioner has suspended the facility of duty free procurement of raw materials by them.2. Shri...

J.S. Gupta and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Central Excise Act - Sections 5A and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 5 and 151A

Reported in : 2005(100)ECC121; 2007(212)ELT22(All)

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Sinha, Adv. and ;D.K. Soni, S.C.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, M/s J. S. Gupta and Sons, seek the following reliefs:'(i) issue suitable writ, Order or...

S.P. Gupta Vs. State and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 133 and 138

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC121; I(2003)BC371

Advocate for Respondent : Vikram Gulati, Adv. and ;S.C.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.2. The petitioner has preferred this Writ Petition under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the...

Sanjay Kumar Gupta and Anr vs Anoop Malik

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 71/2024 1. SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA S/o Sh. J.S. Gupta Flat No. 64, Ashirwad apartments Plot No. 11, Sec-12, Dwarka, New Delhi - 1100752....

Prabhulal Lal and ors. Vs. Babu Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1964All34

Advocate for Respondent : J.S. Gupta, Adv.

B.D. Gupta, J. 1. This is a decree-holder's second appeal against an appellate order whereby an appeal of the decree-holder against an order passed in execution by the executing Court was confirmed.2. The facts, briefly stated,...

Madari Singh Vs. Bhajru and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules - Rules 5 and 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 31

Reported in : AIR1952All93

Advocate for Respondent : J.S. Gupta, Adv.

Harish Chandra, J. 1. This second appeal came up for hearing before my late brother Seth, J. on the 22nd January, 1951. He heard it and pronounced his judgment in open court. It was taken down...

L. Behu Mal Vs. Murli Dhar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63

Reported in : AIR1956All5

Advocate for Respondent : Shanker Sahai Verma and ;J.S. Gupta, Advs.

Raghubar Dayal, J. 1. Behu Mal and others had a decree against Roop Chand and Mehar Chand. In execution of this, decree certain property was attached. Murli Dhar filed a claim under Order 21, Rule 58,...

Ramesh Chand and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 20, 21, 165, 171, 180 and 202; Uttar Pradesh Land Tenures (Legal Proceedings) (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1952 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 27, 27(1) and 27(3)

Reported in : AIR1973All120

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Mandhyan, ;J.S. Gupta and ;V.K.S. Choudhary, Advs.

Satish Chandra, J. 1. A Bench has referred these two connected Special Appeals to a Full Bench because it felt that the decision of another Division Bench in Gotpal Narain v. Kanchan Lal, (AIR 1971 All...

NaraIn Parsad and anr. Vs. Banarsi Das

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 6(3), 6(4) and 12

Reported in : AIR1960All372

Advocate for Respondent : J.S. Gupta, Adv.

V.D. Bhargava, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 6-A of the Court Fees Act.2. The defendant-appellants filed an appeal in the court of the District Judge, Bulandshanr. Therewas an office report to the effect...