Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: j ravindran · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.127 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 2010

R.Nataraj .. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Its Chief Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-08-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.P.S.Raman; Mrs.Pusupa Menon; Mr.J.Ravindran; Mr.K.Sridhar; Mrs.T.Girija; Mr.S.Ragunathan, Advs.

1. The petitioner seeks for the issuance of a Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 9th respondent in O.A.No.245 of 2010 dated 8.3.2010 as well as the order of the 2nd respondent relating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2010

The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Avanashi Goun ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Part III of Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 to 19, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3) and 34; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 19 and 51; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1940 - Sections 28, 29 and 42; ;Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 28, 28(2), 28(3), 29 and 42; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 186 and 188; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : J. Ravindran, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 in W.A. No. 37 of 2002,; N. Manokaran, Adv. and;

R. Banumathi, J.1. These Writ Appeals arise out of the order dated 11.3.2002 made in W.P. No. 20929 of 2000 quashing the proceedings of the District Collector, Erode dated 28.11.2000 made in Ref. No. 64859/2000/K-4, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2006

Consumer Action Group Rep. by Its Trustee Tara Murali Vs. the State of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 2(13), 2(15), 48, 49(1), 49(2), 54, 56, 57, 85(1), 113, 113A, 113A(1), 122, 122(2), 123 and 124; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 1998; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Ordinance, 2000; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 2002; Tamil Nadu Multi-storied Buildings Act, 1973; Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919; Chennai City Municipal Corporation Rules; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 1998; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 43; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC483

Advocate for Respondent : R. Viduthalai, Adv. General assisted by ;Raja Kalifulla, GP assisted by J. Ravindran, Adv. assisted by ;L.N. Praghasham, Adv.

ORDERA.P. Shah, C.J.1. W.P. Nos. 18898 of 2000, 19998 of 2001 and 24316 of 2002 have been filed by the Consumer Action Group challenging the constitutional validity of the amended provisions of Section 113-A of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 22 2010

Madha Dental College and Hospital, Rep. by Its Chairman, Vs. the Union ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-22-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran; Assistant Solicitor; Mr.P.Chandrasekar, Advs.

1. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal. This writ petition is filed for declaring the recommendations of the 2nd respondent, in their Letter No.DE-3(266)-2010/A1805 dated 10.08.2010 addressed to the 1st respondent,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2010

R.Ravichandran ... Vs. the Chairman-cum-managing Director Tamilnadu St ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-03-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran ; Mr.Anandaramani, Advs.

1. The petitioner who is aggrieved by the awarding of transport contract to the 4th respondent by the third respondent is before this court.2. The third respondent invited tender for transport of Indian Made Foreign Liquor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2009

A. Karthikeyan Vs. the Managing Director Tasmac Ltd.,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 58

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ623Mad

Advocate for Respondent : J. Ravindran, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard Ms. N. Indumathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. Ravindran, learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.2. The petitioner is a Salesman in the TASMAC shop. He has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2011

Antony Waste Handling Cell Private Limited Vs. Mr.Anbalagan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-03-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran, Adv.

ORDER1. The contempt complained of is in respect of an interim order passed by this Court dated 24.10.2009 in M.P.No.1 of 2009 in W.P.No.21717 of 2009, by which this Court has granted an order of interim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2010

Rvs Dental College and Hospitals.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-10-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P.Chandrasekaran; Mr. J.Ravindran; Mr. A.Saravanan, Advs.

1. By consent of the learned counsel on either side, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the first respondent dated 15.05.2010 seeking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2011

K.S.Kalyanasundaram and ors. Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Development Auth ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-18-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran, Adv.

O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to receive, consider, process and approve the petitioners' application for demolition and reconstruction by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2011

G.A.NasiruddIn Khan and ors. Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Development Auth ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-18-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.J.Ravindran, Adv.

O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to receive, consider, process and approve the petitioners' application for demolition and reconstruction by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial