Advanced Search Results

Tata Chemicals Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)67ITD56(Mum.)

(Order on letter of Mr. Tralshawala dt. 27th August, 1997 and letter of the CIT-I, Mumbai dt. 1st September, 1997) 1. The appeal was being heard from time to time from 3rd July, 1997.Arguments were being...

Tata Chemicals Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)60TTJ(Mumbai)384

ORDER(Order on letter of Mr. Tralshawala dt. 27th August, 1997 and letter of the CIT-I, Mumbai dt. 1st September, 1997)R. V. EASWAR, J.M. :The appeal was being heard from time to time from 3rd July, 1997....

B.N. Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ranganathan

1. This combined order disposes of three applications, which are similar in nature, cover identical issues and have been heard together.2. Heard Mr. S. Natarajan and Mr. Ranganathan, Proxy for Mr. J.P.Deodhar, learned Counsel for the...

ipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Gajanand Meena, Deputy Cit and ors. (No. 2)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(Bom)582; [2001]251ITR416(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia J.Both the above writ petitions involve the same question of law. Both the petitions involve the same parties. Hence, they are heard together.By the above two writ petitions, the petitioner which is an Export...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shree Warana Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43B; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 81; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 74

Reported in : 2002(2)MhLj96

Advocate for Respondent : P.V. Vaidya and ;S.N. Inamdar, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Tribunal dated 12-7-1999, the Department has filed the present appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961('Act' for short). The respondent herein...

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shree Warna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 28, 43-B, 43-B(1) and 260A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 155(2); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 74

Reported in : (2002)173CTR(Bom)188

Advocate for Respondent : P.V. Vaidya and ;S.N. Inamdar, Advs.

V. C. Daga, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Tribunal dated 12.7.1999, the Department has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short)....

Shivshankar Shivram Singh and ors. Vs. Pramila R. Dwivedi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 4 and 4A; Grants-in-aid Code Special Rules - Rules 5, 12, 13, 14 and 21

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR541

Advocate for Respondent : J.P. Deodhar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;A.K. Savla, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Respondent No. 1 was appointed as a part-time Craft teacher for the period November 13, 1984 upto April 30, 1985. She was continued as a Part-time teacher upto June 30, 1989. She was,...

Raj Breweries Ltd. Vs. Government of India and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3)

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR668; (2003)181CTR(Bom)417; [2003]260ITR220(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Chandurkar and ;R.K. Sharma, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;J.P. Deodhar, Adv. respondent Nos. 3 and 4

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. Tulzapurkar and Mr. Andhyarujina for the petitioners in these petitions. Mr. Chandurkar appears for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Deodhar appears for respondents Nos. 3 and 4.2. All these...

Echbee Corporation Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1991(51)ELT31(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.P. Deodhar, Adv., i/b.,;Mr. K.C. Sidhwa

1. This petition has been filed by Sole Proprietor of Echbee Corporation and the petitioner appeared in person and has raised four contentions as set out in paragraph 7 of the petition. The petition was filed...

Cipla Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Evacuees Property Act

Reported in : 1993LC38(Bombay); 1993(67)ELT61(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri J.P. Deodhar, Adv.

Pendse, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 is a joint stock company incorporated on August 17,1935 under the provisions of the Companies Act. The company runs its factory at Bombay and manufactures medicines known as `Patent and proprietary...