Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: j m banerjea · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 1960

Momtaz Begum Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-26-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 - Section 14A

Reported in : AIR1962Cal202,(1962)IILLJ443Cal

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Banerjea, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is a director of United Rubber Works (Private Limited. The prosecution concerned is one under Section 14(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (Act XIX of 1952) read with Clauses (a), (c)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1950

Kedarnath Agarwalla Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-07-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Section 7(1); ;Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act, 1948

Reported in : AIR1951Cal303,54CWN829

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Banerjea, Adv.

Harries, C.J.1. This is a petition for revision of orders made by a learned Magistrate and a learned Sessions Judge confiscating certain flour.2. It appears that a motor truck carrying flour was held up on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1949

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bhupal Chandra Sinha and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-15-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435 and 439; ; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 421

Reported in : AIR1950Cal421,54CWN438

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Banerjea, Adv.

1. These two rules were issued at the instance of the Corporation of Calcutta in two oases in which two managers of Govt. Stores were proceeded against before the municipal Magistrate of Calcutta under Section 421,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 12 1952

Arabinda Dey Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-12-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33 and 133; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 376; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 256 and 297

Reported in : AIR1953Cal206,57CWN69

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Banerjea, Adv.

Harries, C.J. 1. The appellant was tried by a learned Sessions Judge and a jury upon a charge of rape. He was found guilty by a majority of 3 to 2. The learned Sessions Judge accepted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1952

Mani Bhai Patel Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-05-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 407 and 462

Reported in : AIR1952Cal761,56CWN554

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Banerjea, Adv.

Harries, C.J.1. These are two appeals from convictions by a Municipal Magistrate.2. The three appellants were charged under Section 407 read with Section 489, Calcutta Municipal Act with storing, exposing and offering for sale tea which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1950

Ramesh Lal Saha Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-06-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931 - Section 7 and 7(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(2)

Reported in : AIR1951Cal36,55CWN139

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Banerjea, Adv.

Harries, C.J.1. This is a petition for revision of an order of the learned Additional District Magistrate of 24 Parganas demanding a security of Rs. 1000/- from the petitioner Under Section 7 (l), Press (Emergency Powers)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1956

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Govt. of West Bengal ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-10-1956

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 10A

Reported in : AIR1957Cal20,60CWN743

Advocate for Respondent : Bholanath Roy, ;S.K. Rai Choudhury, Advs. (in Appeal No. 9) and ;Provat K. Sen Gupta and ;Jagdish Ch. Ghose, Advs. (in Appeal No. 13)

J.P. Mitter, J. 1. These appeals against acquittals preferred by the State of West Bengal involve the interpretation of para 70 of the Coal Mines Provident Fund Scheme. 2. The facts leading up to the prosecution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial