Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: j k seth and · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 30 1982

Suresh Kumar Sanghi and 0rs. Vs. Amit Kumar Sanghi and Sons

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-30-1982

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 1983(4)DRJ186

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. J.K. Seth, Shri. Ajant Kumar

D.R. Khanna, J.(1) The firm Sanghi Motors is constituted of seven partners and the business of automobile dealings. It is also holding franchise/ dealership of M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. for the distribution and sale of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2003

Smt. Prem Lata Gupta and anr. Vs. Dunlop India Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2003

Subject : SICATenancy

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act - Sections 21, 22, 22(1) and 25; Delhi Rent Control Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 5 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 20, Rule 18

Reported in : 2003IAD(Delhi)817; III(2003)BC542; [2003]114CompCas689(Delhi); 103(2003)DLT112; 2003(68)DRJ29; [2004]51SCL616(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : J.K. Seth, Sr. Adv. and ; K. Prashant Singh, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. This suit has been filed praying for the passing of a decree for ejectment of the Defendant from 8/3, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi; for a decree in the sum of Rs.2,40,000/-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2001

JaIn Society for the Protection of Orphans for India Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-2001

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6, 8 and 13; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 223, 236 and 276; General Clauses Act; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi484; 93(2001)DLT798; 2002(61)DRJ71

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. J.K. Seth, Sr. Adv. and ; Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Adv.

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. Whether the petitioner, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is prohibited from obtaining letters of administration because of Section 236...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 26 2012

Amit Johri Vs. Deepak Johri and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-26-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pratap Shanker, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. J.K. Seth, Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Promil Seth

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No.18548/2011 (by defendants No.11 and 12 u/O VII R 1.CPC in CS(OS) No. 818/2011 Reserved on: Date of decision: IN THE MATTER OF: AMIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2001

Shri Bhanu Mehra Vs. Shri Dato Brij Kishore and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : 2001(60)DRJ1

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.K. Seth, Senior Adv. and ;Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Adv.

ORDERDevinder Gupta, J.1. The defendant/appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree passed by Shri A.K.Garg, Additional District Judge, Delhi in suit No.391 of 1999 decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondent for possession of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1984

Abdul Latif and ors. Vs. Mohammad Siddiq

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-06-1984

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 53; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 16(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 27(1985)DLT423

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.K. Seth

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) M/S. Mohammed Hasan and Mohammad Siddiq, a partnership firm was constituted of Abdul Karim (now deceased) and Mohammad Siddiq, defendant as partners. It was engaged in the business of general merchandise but...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2000

Pritam Chand JaIn Vs. Bir Kumar and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-04-2000

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT640; 2000(54)DRJ863

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. J.K. Seth, Sr. Advocate, ; Sh. Mohinder Rana and ; Sh.

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Plaintiff filed this suit, inter alia, alleging that he became member of Vardhman Cooperative House Building Society, Kamla Nagar, Delhi in the year 1966 and against payment of Rs.14,155.40 from time to time...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2001

Jyoti Gupta Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-09-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2002ACJ1056; 2001IVAD(Delhi)959; 91(2001)DLT427; 2001(59)DRJ223

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Salwan, Adv.

K. Rama Moorthy, J.1. The appeal is against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 29.7.1992 according a sum of Rs. 33,161/- as compensation to the appellant. The facts culminating in the filing of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2003

Dunlop India Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-13-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Payment of the Gratuity Act - Sections 4(1), 4(6) and 7(7)

Reported in : 2003VIAD(Delhi)81; 106(2003)DLT135; 2003(71)DRJ175; (2003)IIILLJ125Del

Advocate for Respondent : Nishakant Pandey, Adv. for respondents 1 to 3 and ; Prosenjeet Banerjee, Adv. for respondent No. 4

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Rule. 2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. This writ petition challenges the order dated 5th April, 2002 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 1993

Jeewan Mehrotra Vs. Kalawanti Kotwani

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-30-1993

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1993(27)DRJ79

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gupta

Usha Mehra, J.(1) The short point involved is whether the admission made by the respondent in para 14 of the petition can be withdrawn. (2) The point involved is very short and does not require any...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial