Advanced Search Results
Suresh Kumar Sanghi and 0rs. Vs. Amit Kumar Sanghi and Sons
Delhi
Nov-30-1982
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17
1983(4)DRJ186
Shri. J.K. Seth, Shri. Ajant Kumar
D.R. Khanna, J.(1) The firm Sanghi Motors is constituted of seven partners and the business of automobile dealings. It is also holding franchise/ dealership of M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. for the distribution and sale of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Prem Lata Gupta and anr. Vs. Dunlop India Limited
Delhi
Jan-31-2003
SICATenancy
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act - Sections 21, 22, 22(1) and 25; Delhi Rent Control Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 5 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 20, Rule 18
2003IAD(Delhi)817; III(2003)BC542; [2003]114CompCas689(Delhi); 103(2003)DLT112; 2003(68)DRJ29; [2004]51SCL616(Delhi)
J.K. Seth, Sr. Adv. and ; K. Prashant Singh, Adv.
Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. This suit has been filed praying for the passing of a decree for ejectment of the Defendant from 8/3, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi; for a decree in the sum of Rs.2,40,000/-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaIn Society for the Protection of Orphans for India Vs. the State
Delhi
Aug-17-2001
Trusts and Societies
Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6, 8 and 13; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 223, 236 and 276; General Clauses Act; Companies Act, 1956
AIR2001Delhi484; 93(2001)DLT798; 2002(61)DRJ71
Sh. J.K. Seth, Sr. Adv. and ; Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Adv.
ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. Whether the petitioner, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is prohibited from obtaining letters of administration because of Section 236...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Amit Johri Vs. Deepak Johri and ors.
Delhi
Nov-26-2012
Land Acquisition
Mr. Pratap Shanker, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. J.K. Seth, Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Promil Seth
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No.18548/2011 (by defendants No.11 and 12 u/O VII R 1.CPC in CS(OS) No. 818/2011 Reserved on: Date of decision: IN THE MATTER OF: AMIT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Bhanu Mehra Vs. Shri Dato Brij Kishore and Others
Delhi
May-11-2001
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 12, Rule 6
2001(60)DRJ1
Mr. J.K. Seth, Senior Adv. and ;Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Adv.
ORDERDevinder Gupta, J.1. The defendant/appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree passed by Shri A.K.Garg, Additional District Judge, Delhi in suit No.391 of 1999 decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondent for possession of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Latif and ors. Vs. Mohammad Siddiq
Delhi
Nov-06-1984
Commercial
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 53; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 16(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
27(1985)DLT423
Mr. J.K. Seth
D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) M/S. Mohammed Hasan and Mohammad Siddiq, a partnership firm was constituted of Abdul Karim (now deceased) and Mohammad Siddiq, defendant as partners. It was engaged in the business of general merchandise but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Chand JaIn Vs. Bir Kumar and Another
Delhi
Jul-04-2000
Trusts and SocietiesProperty
86(2000)DLT640; 2000(54)DRJ863
Sh. J.K. Seth, Sr. Advocate, ; Sh. Mohinder Rana and ; Sh.
ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Plaintiff filed this suit, inter alia, alleging that he became member of Vardhman Cooperative House Building Society, Kamla Nagar, Delhi in the year 1966 and against payment of Rs.14,155.40 from time to time...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyoti Gupta Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.
Delhi
Mar-09-2001
Motor Vehicles
2002ACJ1056; 2001IVAD(Delhi)959; 91(2001)DLT427; 2001(59)DRJ223
Sushil Salwan, Adv.
K. Rama Moorthy, J.1. The appeal is against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 29.7.1992 according a sum of Rs. 33,161/- as compensation to the appellant. The facts culminating in the filing of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDunlop India Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Aug-13-2003
Civil
Payment of the Gratuity Act - Sections 4(1), 4(6) and 7(7)
2003VIAD(Delhi)81; 106(2003)DLT135; 2003(71)DRJ175; (2003)IIILLJ125Del
Nishakant Pandey, Adv. for respondents 1 to 3 and ; Prosenjeet Banerjee, Adv. for respondent No. 4
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Rule. 2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. This writ petition challenges the order dated 5th April, 2002 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJeewan Mehrotra Vs. Kalawanti Kotwani
Delhi
May-30-1993
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
1993(27)DRJ79
Mr. Gupta
Usha Mehra, J.(1) The short point involved is whether the admission made by the respondent in para 14 of the petition can be withdrawn. (2) The point involved is very short and does not require any...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »