Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A.T. Balakrishnan
Chennai
Mar-18-1998
Direct Taxation
(1998)148CTR(Mad)618
N.V. BALASUBRAMAAMAN, J.In the above batch of tax cases, following questions of law arising under IT Act, 1961 as well as under the WT Act, 1957 for certain assessment years in respect of some of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Chennai
Oct-06-1976
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Schedule - Rule 5
[1977]109ITR637(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and ;Nalini Chidambaram, Advs.
Ismail, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Bench, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court:'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenkatesh Emporium Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Mar-20-1981
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40
[1982]137ITR593(Mad)
J. Jayaraman, Adv.
Balasubrahmanyan, J. 1. The assessee in these cases is a firm by name M/s. Venkatesh Emporium. The firm consists of three partners of whom K. Venkatesan is one with a 40% share therin. He is a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lakshmi Card Clothing Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-ta ...
Chennai
Jun-14-1983
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 37(1)
[1984]149ITR717(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and ;Nalini Chidambarm, Advs.
Ramanujam, J. 1. The assessee-company had entered into a collaboration agreement dated February 23, 1961, with one M/s. Graf Sales of Switzerland (hereinafter referred to as the 'foreign company'). As per clause 9 of the said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Arunagiri Chettiar Vs. Third Income-tax Officer and anr.
Chennai
Jan-17-1978
Direct Taxation
Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 25; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 185(1), 187(2), 189(1) and 189(3)
[1979]117ITR308(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and ;Nalini Chidambaram, Advs.
Mohan, J. 1. These writ petitions are for prohibition prohibiting the respondents herein from taking recovery proceedings against the petitioner under the provisions of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), relating to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Parthasarathy Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Chennai
Mar-30-1977
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 9, 34(3) and 34(4)
[1980]124ITR844(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and Nalini Chidambaram, Advs.
Ismail, J. 1. One Ramabadra Iyer died on October 14, 1962, and the proceedings relate to the assessment to estate duty of his dutiable estate. He and his paternal cousin, Kasivisvanatha Iyer, originally constituted an HUF....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.R. Rajakumari Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and anr.
Chennai
Dec-23-1977
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3) - Schedule - Rule 28
[1979]116ITR306(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and ;Nalini Chidambaram, Advs.
Mohan, J.1. This writ petition is for certiorari to quash the proceedings in T.R.C. No. 1 of 1974, on the file of the Tax Recovery Commissioner, Madras-I, Madras, dated February 11, 1975.2. The short facts are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Harikrishnan Vs. the Registrar and Others
Chennai
Oct-09-1990
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269 (UA), (UB), (UC) and (UL) and 276 (AB)
[1991]192ITR391(Mad)
J. Jayaraman, Adv.
Govindasamy, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition for issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the order dated February 15, 1989, in Application No. 686 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsa John Devinathan and anr. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax
Chennai
Jun-25-1979
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147
(1980)16CTR(Mad)260; [1980]126ITR270(Mad)
J. Jayaraman and ;Nalini Chidambaram, Advs.
Sethuraman, J. 1. T.C. No. 119 of 1975 is a consolidated reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for the assessment years 1957-58...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSivanandiia Steels Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.
Chennai
Dec-13-1993
Direct Taxation
(1999)151CTR(Mad)569
ORDERRAJH 4 J.By consent of parties, the main writ petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal.2. These batch of writ petitions have been filed by different assessees majority of them under the IT Act, praying...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »