Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: j i mehta · Page 1 of about 46 results (0.189 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 1992

Sharad R. Khanna and ors. Vs. Industrial Credit and Investment Corp. o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1992

Subject : Contract

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 2, 9(2), 9(5) and 12(2); Presidency Towns Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1978; Bombay Insolvency Rules, 1910 - Rule 52B(5); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 132 and 140

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR546

Advocate for Respondent : J.I. Mehta and ;Y.B. Pandya, Advs., i/b., ;Pandya & Poonawala

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this Notice of Motion, the judgment debtor is seeking to set aside the Insolvency Notice No. N/108 of 1991 dated 27th August, 1991. The judgment debtors had impugned the validity of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1976

In Re: Jaifabs Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-16-1976

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 338; Companies Act

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas434(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : J.I. Mehta, Adv.

Aggarwal, J.1. The company had been wound up by my judgment and order dated 6th/9th February, 1976. As regards the question of costs of the company, the question was left open in order to enable to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1979

Gangadhar Vishnu Puranik, Etc. Vs. Anandji Jethabai and Co., Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-20-1979

Subject : Civil

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 7, 52(2), 53, 54 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 36, 47, 60, 64, 73 and 85(3) - Order 21, Rule 16 - Order 34, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1980Bom115

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Mehta, Adv.;N.G. Thakkar, Adv. i/b., Solomon and Co.;J.I. Mehta,;Divekar and;Virag V. Tulzapurkar, Advs.

1. The insolvent, Gangadhar Vishnu Puranik, was originally the Karta of a joint family consisting of himself, his wife and sons. Some time in March 1965 and February 1966, the joint family of the insolvent had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 09 1972

Zuri Agro Chemicals Ltd. Vs. F.S. Wadia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-09-1972

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 17(3), 17(6), 85, 106 and 173

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR15; [1974]44CompCas465(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : J.I. Mehta, Adv.

Nain, J.1. This is a petition for confirmation of a special resolution dated June 29, 1972, passed by Zuri Agro Chemicals Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), altering its memorandum of association by transferring the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1991

The Scotch Whiskhy Association and Another Vs. Pravara Sahakar Shakar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-1991

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 29; Companies Act, 1956; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1992Bom294; 1992(2)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : J.I. Mehta with;Virendra V. Tulzapurkar,;Dara P. Menta and;Sharad Abhyankar instructed by;M/s. Little and Co.;;I.M. Chagla with;Virag V. Tulzapurkar instructed by;M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co.

1. The 1st plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Companies Act of the United Kingdom with the object, inter alia, to protect and promote the interests of the scotch whisky trade generally, both in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1976

Virendrasingh Bhandari and ors. Vs. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons P. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1976

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 433, 439 and 443(2); Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 162

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas532(MP)

J.S. Verma, J.1. This petition under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act ') is primarily for a direction to wind up the company--' M/s. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1991

Hindustan Lever Limited, Vs. Nirma Private Limited, Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-1991

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 29; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 15(2), 17, 48 and 51

Reported in : AIR1992Bom195

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Shah,;J.J. Bhatt and;Vikram Trivedi, Advs. i/by;M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal

1. Hindustan Lever Ltd., has filed this suit against Nirma Private Ltd., seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using in relation to soaps or detergent powder the impugned carton, a photograph of which is annexed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1989

Nimesh K. Thakkar and Others Vs. Official Liquidator and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-1989

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 536

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR639; (1989)91BOMLR395; [1991]70CompCas257(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.H. Doctor, Adv.

Sujata Manohar, J. 1. This judge's summoned is taken out by 28 applicants against the official liquidator of Sreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd. in liquidation. 2. A company petition for winding up of sreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1984

In Re: New Swadeshi Mills of Ahmedabad Ltd. and Manjushri Textiles

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-16-1984

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529(2)

Reported in : [1985]58CompCas86(Guj)

Majmudar, J. 1. In this company application taken out by the official liquidator, he has prayed for certain directions against the concerned respondents which are nine in number calling upon them to release sufficient funds to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1991

Kishore Y. Patel and Others Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 186, 391, 397, 398 and 643; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1992Bom114; [1994]79CompCas53(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : I.M. Chagla,;J. Avaria and;Khambatta, Advs., i/b;M/s. Hariram & Co. and;S.F. Vajifdar

ORDER1. The plaintiffs are shareholders of Patel Engineering Company Ltd., the 1st defendant company in this suit. The defendants Nos.2 to 8 are also the shareholders of the 1st defendant company. There are two groups of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial