Advanced Search Results
Sharad R. Khanna and ors. Vs. Industrial Credit and Investment Corp. o ...
Mumbai
Sep-18-1992
Contract
Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 2, 9(2), 9(5) and 12(2); Presidency Towns Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1978; Bombay Insolvency Rules, 1910 - Rule 52B(5); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 132 and 140
1993(1)BomCR546
J.I. Mehta and ;Y.B. Pandya, Advs., i/b., ;Pandya & Poonawala
D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this Notice of Motion, the judgment debtor is seeking to set aside the Insolvency Notice No. N/108 of 1991 dated 27th August, 1991. The judgment debtors had impugned the validity of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Jaifabs Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Feb-16-1976
Company
Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 338; Companies Act
[1977]47CompCas434(Bom)
J.I. Mehta, Adv.
Aggarwal, J.1. The company had been wound up by my judgment and order dated 6th/9th February, 1976. As regards the question of costs of the company, the question was left open in order to enable to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGangadhar Vishnu Puranik, Etc. Vs. Anandji Jethabai and Co., Etc.
Mumbai
Aug-20-1979
Civil
Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 7, 52(2), 53, 54 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 36, 47, 60, 64, 73 and 85(3) - Order 21, Rule 16 - Order 34, Rule 1
AIR1980Bom115
R.D. Mehta, Adv.;N.G. Thakkar, Adv. i/b., Solomon and Co.;J.I. Mehta,;Divekar and;Virag V. Tulzapurkar, Advs.
1. The insolvent, Gangadhar Vishnu Puranik, was originally the Karta of a joint family consisting of himself, his wife and sons. Some time in March 1965 and February 1966, the joint family of the insolvent had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Zuri Agro Chemicals Ltd. Vs. F.S. Wadia and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-09-1972
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 17(3), 17(6), 85, 106 and 173
(1974)76BOMLR15; [1974]44CompCas465(Bom)
J.I. Mehta, Adv.
Nain, J.1. This is a petition for confirmation of a special resolution dated June 29, 1972, passed by Zuri Agro Chemicals Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), altering its memorandum of association by transferring the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Scotch Whiskhy Association and Another Vs. Pravara Sahakar Shakar ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-1991
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 29; Companies Act, 1956; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960
AIR1992Bom294; 1992(2)BomCR219
J.I. Mehta with;Virendra V. Tulzapurkar,;Dara P. Menta and;Sharad Abhyankar instructed by;M/s. Little and Co.;;I.M. Chagla with;Virag V. Tulzapurkar instructed by;M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co.
1. The 1st plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Companies Act of the United Kingdom with the object, inter alia, to protect and promote the interests of the scotch whisky trade generally, both in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirendrasingh Bhandari and ors. Vs. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons P. Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-23-1976
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 433, 439 and 443(2); Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 162
[1979]49CompCas532(MP)
J.S. Verma, J.1. This petition under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act ') is primarily for a direction to wind up the company--' M/s. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Limited, Vs. Nirma Private Limited, Ahmedabad
Mumbai
Sep-09-1991
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 29; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 15(2), 17, 48 and 51
AIR1992Bom195
M.H. Shah,;J.J. Bhatt and;Vikram Trivedi, Advs. i/by;M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal
1. Hindustan Lever Ltd., has filed this suit against Nirma Private Ltd., seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using in relation to soaps or detergent powder the impugned carton, a photograph of which is annexed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNimesh K. Thakkar and Others Vs. Official Liquidator and Others
Mumbai
Nov-30-1989
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 536
1990(1)BomCR639; (1989)91BOMLR395; [1991]70CompCas257(Bom)
S.H. Doctor, Adv.
Sujata Manohar, J. 1. This judge's summoned is taken out by 28 applicants against the official liquidator of Sreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd. in liquidation. 2. A company petition for winding up of sreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: New Swadeshi Mills of Ahmedabad Ltd. and Manjushri Textiles
Gujarat
Oct-16-1984
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529(2)
[1985]58CompCas86(Guj)
Majmudar, J. 1. In this company application taken out by the official liquidator, he has prayed for certain directions against the concerned respondents which are nine in number calling upon them to release sufficient funds to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishore Y. Patel and Others Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others
Mumbai
Jul-04-1991
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 186, 391, 397, 398 and 643; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 40, Rule 1
AIR1992Bom114; [1994]79CompCas53(Bom)
I.M. Chagla,;J. Avaria and;Khambatta, Advs., i/b;M/s. Hariram & Co. and;S.F. Vajifdar
ORDER1. The plaintiffs are shareholders of Patel Engineering Company Ltd., the 1st defendant company in this suit. The defendants Nos.2 to 8 are also the shareholders of the 1st defendant company. There are two groups of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »