Advanced Search Results

Chanan Singh Vs. Hari Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1971CriLJ989

ORDERD.D. Seth, J.1. This application in revision is directed against an order passed by the learned Sessions Judge of Kumaun, dated 5th October, 1968, and arises out of the following circumstances:There had been on two previous...

Kunwar Ayurvedic Pharmacy Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7F

Reported in : AIR1971All295

Advocate for Respondent : J.D. Pradhan, Adv. and ;G.N. Kunzru, Sr. Counsel

Tripathi, J.1. The appellant is a tenant of premises No. 19/27 Patkapur, Kanpur, Respondent No. 4 Smt. Chando Devi is the landlady of the premises. The premises is governed by the provisions of the U. P....

Nanku Vs. Pathar Din

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 180 and 288; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 144

Reported in : AIR1952All305

Advocate for Respondent : J.D. Pradhan, Adv.

Kidwai, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by Pathar Din respondent for possession of some tenancy land against the appellant. Pachai, grandfather of the respondent and father of Nanku, held an agricultural...

Beni Madhav (Deceased by L. Rs.) and anr. Vs. Smt. Chameli Devi (Decea ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 132

Reported in : AIR1985All89

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Jauhari, ;J.D. Pradhan and ;Iqbal Ahmad, Advs.

B.D. Agarwal, J.1. The sole question raised in this second appeal arising from Original Suit No. 61 of 1961 institutued in the Court of Civil Judge, Budaun on July 12, 1961 is of limitation. Far back...

Ram Udit and anr. Vs. Smt. Shyam Kali

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zemindary Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 34, 48 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 41, Rules 27 and 33

Reported in : AIR1954All751

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Bhat, Adv. holding brief of J.D. Pradhan, Adv.

Sapru, J.1. This second appeal raised an interesting question of law. In order that that question may be properly understood, it is necessary to set out the facts which have given rise to the appeal.2. The...

M/S. Premlaxmi and Co. Vs. Trafalgar House Construction India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 7(5) and 11; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR412; 1998(4)BomCR830; (1998)3BOMLR708; 1998(3)MhLj695

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Seervai, ;S.V. Doijode and ;P.A. Kabadi, Advs., i/by M/s. Shah Desai Doijode & Phatarphekar

ORDERM.B. Shah, C.J.1. This application is filed by the applicant M/s. Premlaxmi & Co. against the Respondent Trafalgar House Construction India Ltd. under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, for the sake...

Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay Vs. Associated Engineers

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 69, 70 and 71; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 20

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR341

Advocate for Respondent : Virendra V. Tulzapurkar, Adv., i/b., ;Gordhandas Fozdar, Adv.

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to set aside and/or remit the Award dated 31st May, 1990 which has been filed in this Court and numbered as Award No. 74 of 1990.2. Briefly...