Advanced Search Results

Madhya Pradesh Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Lt ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

ORDER SHEET GA No.2744 of 2015 APOT No.383 of 2015 AP No.155 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE MADHYA PRADESH IRON & STEEL Co.LTD.Versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD BEFORE:...

R.A.V. Dravya (P) Ltd. Vs. Concast Global Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE ACO No.206 of 2015 APOT No.547 of 2015 CP No.89 of 2014 R.A.V.DRAVYA (P) LTD.VERSUS CONCAST GLOBAL LTD.-AndACO No.207 of 2015 APOT No.548...

Indra Kumar Agarwal and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar Gupta and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (ORIGINAL SIDE) APD No.317 of 2014 APOT No.4 OF2014arising out of C.S.No.461 OF1984INDRA KUMAR AGARWAL & ORS.versus SURESH KUMAR GUPTA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon’ble Justice INDIRA BANERJEE...

Varun Raj Bagree Vs. Rathindra Nath Bandhopadhyay and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

GA No.1337 of 2016 With RVWO No.15 of 2016 APD No.165 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF: VARUN RAJ BAGREE VERSUS RATHINDRA NATH BANDHOPADHYAY &...

Dharamraj Prasad and Anr Vs. Sanjoy Kumar Sett

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

ORDER SHEET GA No.2031 of 2016 APDT No.13 of2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DHARAMRAJ PRASAD & ANR Versus SANJOY KUMAR SETT BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE The Hon'ble...

Paritosh Kumar Mukhopadhyay Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

GA No.127 of 2017 WP No.5 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PARITOSH KUMAR MUKHOPADHYAY Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date :...

Kavali Hanumanna Vs. Huzurappa and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 43 and 122; The Indian Contracts Act, 1872 - Sections 11; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14; Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 27, 65 and 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 126;

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD815; 1999(6)ALT626

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K. Mahipathy Rao, Adv.

1. This appeal is preferred by the plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Mahabnbnagar dated 8-4-1985 passed in AS No.32 of 1982. By the impugned judgment and decree, the...

Deoki Nandan Vs. M.L. Gupta, Sales Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1969]23STC481(All)

R.L. Gulati, J.1. This and the connected writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order as they are of the same petitioner and raise identical questions. The petitioner in all these writ petitions is...

The State Vs. Golam Rasul

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 492 and 492(1); ;Calcutta High Court (Extension of Jurisdiction) Act, 1953; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 -Section 2(7); ;Constitution of India - Article 258(1)

Reported in : AIR1970Cal162

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Sinha and ;I.A. Qayum, Advs.

Amaresh Roy, J.1. This appeal fa from Andaman and Nicobar Islands and has been preferred by the State through the Public Prosecutor, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, against an order of acquittal passed by the Additional District...

B.N. Mehrotra and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Boilers Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 6 and 23; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3(42)

Reported in : AIR1956Cal137,1956CriLJ529,60CWN305

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Sinha, Adv.

ORDERDebabrata Mookerjee, J. 1. This Rule was issued to show cause why certain proceedings pending against these petitioners under Section 6(c) read with Section 23, Indian Boilers Act should not be quashed or why such other...