Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: j b saxena · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.145 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 22 1961

Official Liquidator Vs. Mathura Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-22-1961

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 235; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 543; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1963All55

Advocate for Respondent : Ambika Pd. and ;L. Chandra, Advs.

ORDERA.P. Srivastava, J.1. This is an application under Section 235 of the Indian Companies Act of 1913.The Vijai Lakshmi Sugar Mills was a private limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 in the year...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1950

Rampal Vs. Mangia

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-07-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 256 and 258

Reported in : AIR1952Raj60

Advocate for Respondent : J.B. Saxena, Adv.

Ranawat, J.1. Rampal lodged a complaint against Mangia and Lakkha of offences under Sections 447 and 504 IP. C. in the Court of the First Magistrate, Sawai Madhopur, on the 19th of October, 1948, alleging that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1989

Monica Enterprises and 4 ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-1989

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1989)(23)LC518Tri(Delhi)

1. These appeals arise out of a common order-in-original and they relate to common issues. These have, therefore, been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. The facts of the case as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 1969

The Himalaya Drug Co. Vs. Warner-lambert Pharmaceutical Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-1969

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR528

Mody, J.1. By this petition the petitioners who are a firm have filed an appeal against the Judgment and Order of the Deputy Registrar dismissing the Opposition filed by the petitioners before him. The respondent is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial