Advanced Search Results
Shri Manjit Singh S/O Moolsingh Sethi Vs. Maharashtra Assembly, Mahara ...
Mumbai
Jul-04-2006
Criminal
Right to Information Act (RTI) - Sections 30; Evidence Act; Delhi's Laws Act, 1912; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 3; Advocates Act, 1961; Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 9, 9A and 14(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Maharashtra Legislative Rules - Rules 74, 76, 277 and 284; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19(1), 20, 21, 22, 22(1), 32, 105, 141, 143(1), 194, 194(3), 208, 208(1), 212, 226 and 226(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2006(4)MhLj834
None
V.M. Kanade, J.1. The Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and is seeking appropriate writ to quash the impugned order dated 11th/12th April 2006 whereby the petitioner was sentenced...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Tata Power Company Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the India ...
Mumbai
Dec-24-2004
Electricity
Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22, 22(1), 29, 73, 111 and 127; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 46, 57, 57A and 57B; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 110; Electricity Act, 1910; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998
2005(3)BomCR867
R.A. Dada, Sr. Adv., ; J.J. Bhatt and ; Anjali Chandurkar, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for respondent No. 1, ; Shyam Diwan, Adv., i/b., Little & Co. for responde
Dalveer Bhandari, C.J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 31st May, 2004 passed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short, 'MERC').2. The brief facts, which are necessary to dispose of the petition, are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh B. Desai and ors. Vs. BipIn Vadilal Mehta and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-11-2006
Company
Companies Act - Sections 77, 77(1), 77(2), 83(1), 91(1), 100 to 104, 111, 155 and 402; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 137 - Sections 3 and 4 to 24; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 7, Rules 2, 7 and 11 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 14, Rule 2, 2(1) and 2(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Order 14, Rule 2; ;Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 17 and 17(1); ;Companies (Court) Rules - Rule 6; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 18; Limitation Act, 1939 - Sections 26
AIR2006SC3672; 2006(5)ALD18(SC); 2007(1)AWC299(SC); 2006(5)BomCR574; [2006]132CompCas479(SC); (2006)5CompLJ203(SC); (2006)3GLR2495; JT2006(6)SC253; (2006)4MLJ174(SC); 2006(; MANU/SC/2996/2006
Iqbal Chagla, ; V.A. Bobde, ; Sudhir Nanavati, ;
G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 10.3.2000 of a Division Bench of High Court of Gujarat by which the appeal preferred against the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nagendra Reddy Vs. M G Shanthkumar
Karnataka
Apr-01-2024
Land Acquisition
Sri. RVS Naik, Mr. Iqbal Chagla
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:13114-DB RFA No.200 of 2013 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE1T DAY OF APRIL, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY AND THE HON'BLE MR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWockhardt Limited Vs. Mahesh Medical and General Stores and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-23-2002
Intellectual property rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28 and 106
2002(5)BomCR633
Pragnya K. Vasa, Adv. for defendant No. 1., Iqbal Chagla and Gaurav Joshi, Advs. i/b. Vimadalal & Co., for defendant No. 2.
P.V. Kakade, J.1. The plaintiff has taken out this Notice of Motion in a suit, inter alia, for an order and injunction restraining the defendants by an interim order and injunction from in any manner using...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Entertainment Network and anr. Vs. W.S.G. Cricket Pte. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-21-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940
AIR2003SC1177; 2003(1)ARBLR533(SC); 2003(1)CTC429; JT2003(1)SC382; (2003)2MLJ98(SC); 2003(1)SCALE388; (2003)4SCC341; [2003]1SCR480
Iqbal Chagla, Sr. Adv., ; Anil Menon, ; Ravi Kadam, ;
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. This appeal is from the judgment and order dated April 1, 2002 made by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-08-2008
Electricity
Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 22(2); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2 and 21(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 2(17), 2(61), 14, 14(2), 42, 42(2), 43, 60, 62(1) and 79(2); Electricity Act, 1903 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Indian Factories Act, 1881; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(10); Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Distribution, open access), Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 3
2008LC(SC)527; 2008(9)SCALE824; (2008)10SCC321
Altamas Kabir, J.1. As these three appeals arise out of a common judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, they were taken up for final hearing together.2. The genesis of these three appeals is a petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Colgate Palmolive (i) Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-17-1997
MRTP
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 10, 12A, 36A, 36B and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
AIR1998SC526; [1998]92CompCas72(SC); JT1997(10)SC214; 1997(7)SCALE698; (1998)1SCC720; [1997]Supp6SCR572; 1998(1)LC327(SC)
Soli J. Sorabjee, ; Iqbal Chagla and ; Kirit Raval, Seni
M. Jagannadha Rao, J. 1. Hindustan Lever Ltd. has filed this Civil Appeal under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter called the Act) against the order of the Monopolies &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors. Overruled
Supreme Court of India
Dec-30-1981
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 124, , 136, 139A, 163, 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 218, 221(1), 222, 224, 224(1) 226, 233(1), 234 and 368; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133, 162 and 162(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 91 and 92 - Order 17, Rule 2 - Order 31, Rule 19A; Evidence Act - Sections 114, 123, 124, 132, 162 and 162(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 220; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. These writ petitions filed in different High Courts and transferred to this Court under Article 139 of the Constitution raise issues of great constitutional importance affecting the independence of the judiciary and they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenture Global Engineering Llc Vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd &Amp; Anr Etc
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-2017
Arbitration
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s.)17753-17755 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No(s). 29747-29749 of 2013) VENTURE GLOBAL ENGINEERING LLC Appellant(s) VERSUS TECH MAHINDRA LTD & ANR ETC. Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »