Advanced Search Results

Marthon J. Sangma Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

B.P. Katakey, J.1. The Community and Rural Development Department, Government of Meghalaya issued an advertisement dated 31st July, 2001 inviting applications from the interested persons serving in the State Government of Meghalaya in developmental line departments...

Jai Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(1)WLN88

R.S. Verma, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Shri Gyan Prakash Pandey, Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar, dated 27-10-1986. In all, 11 persons including the present ten appellants, namely, Jai Singh, Ram Swaroop, Amar...

Darbari Lal Vs. Kartar Singh (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 7

Reported in : (1996)114PLR759

N.K. Kapoor, J. 1. This is defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Judge affirming in appeal the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court.2. Briefly put, plaintiff filed a suit for...

Joga Singh Vs. Samma Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50

Reported in : (1996)113PLR78

Advocate for Respondent : C.B. Goel and; R.C. Chouhan, Advs.

R.L. Anand, J.1. This is a regular second appeal filed by Joga Singh (Major) and Kahla Singh, claiming himself to be the minor son of Gurbax Singh, through his mother Suit. Anup Kaur, against Smt. Samma...

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Boota Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , - Sections 162 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 117, 127, 162, 164, 288 and 342; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 364, 394, 419, 465, 466 and 471

Reported in : AIR1979SC564; (1979)1SCC31; [1979]1SCR298

Advocate for Respondent : A.N. Mulla, ; Yogeswar Pd.., ; S.K. Gagga and ;

Fazal Ali, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order of the Allahabad High Court dated 29th September, 1970 by which the High Court acquitted the respondents of the charges framed against them...

Sitam Ram Vs. Jai Baboo

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 13

Reported in : 9(1973)DLT491; 1973RLR509

S.N. Shankar, J. (1) This revision has been referred for decision by a larger bench because of divergence of views expressed in the cases- Vas Dev v. Sohan Singh and others (1968) D.L.T. 492 and Inder...

Aduram vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Bir Inder Singh Gurm, Ms. Anmol Kaur Minhas

$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1152/2026 ADURAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gulshan Kumar Maurya, Ms. Snehlata Sharma and Mr. Dhiraj Verma, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms....

Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1968 - Sections 19(1)

Reported in : 7(1971)DLT270

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Inder Singh

S. Rangarajan, J. (1) The petitioner seeks a direction quashing the order of the Lieutenant-Governor dated 7th July, 1970 appointing Shri Bhagwan Singh (fourth respondent) as the President of the Municipal Committee, Paonta, under proviso to...

Tilak Raj Vs. Dinesh Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1982HP62

Advocate for Respondent : Inder Singh, Adv.

ORDERH.S. Thakur, J.1. In this revision petition, Shri Tilka Raj petitioner has assailed the order of the learned District Judge, Mandi, Kulu and Lahaul Spiti districts, at Mandi, dated 23rd of April, 1980, who upheld the...

Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Dua Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi44; 1988(2)ARBLR315(Delhi); 36(1988)DLT133

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Bharat Inder Singh

B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The plaintiff has filed a suit alleging that its registered trade mark 'CALMPOSE' has been infringed by the defendant, who is manufacturing similar medicine and marketing under the mark of 'CALMPROSE'. The...